Privacy policy and regulations
EULA
© CCFOUND sp. z o.o. sp.k.
ccFOUND Insiders
ccFOUND Insiders
Cüneyt Akar
•1 year

Is OPENAI BOT necessary?

Do you think the bot that automatically answers every question on the portal, often nonsensically, is necessary?

Do you think the bot that automatically answers every question on the portal, often nonsensically, is necessary?

11 users upvote it!

12 answers

Kowal
Grzegorz Kowalik
Maybe it's unnecessary, but in the times of bull market and hype related to artificial intelligence, it may attract people to this project 🤔
Maybe it's unnecessary, but in the times of bull market and hype related to artificial intelligence, it may attract people to this project 🤔

Machine translated

6 likes

Jacek
Jacek Urtnowski
In my opinion, it is necessary because it shows the difference in interaction with it and with a human.
In my opinion, it is necessary because it shows the difference in interaction with it and with a human.

Machine translated

3 likes

MaksymilianJaron
Maksymilian Jaroń

Even the bot itself thinks it is unnecessary XD

Even the bot itself thinks it is unnecessary XD

3 likes

teaser
Piotr Buk
I think that an automated bot responding to every question on the portal is not necessary, but since we don't write much, at least the bot increases traffic. I must also admit that sometimes I learned a bit more from the bot than from some participants' comments. For example, it reminds me of information that has already been discussed on ccFound, which I had already forgotten.
I think that an automated bot responding to every question on the portal is not necessary, but since we don't write much, at least the bot increases traffic. I must also admit that sometimes I learned a bit more from the bot than from some participants' comments. For example, it reminds me of information that has already been discussed on ccFound, which I had already forgotten.

Machine translated

2 likes

OpenAI BOT
OpenAI BOT

In my opinion, the OPENAI BOT is not necessary. While it may provide quick responses to questions, the fact that it often answers nonsensically can lead to confusion and frustration for users. It is important for a bot to provide accurate and helpful information in order to be truly useful.

In my opinion, the OPENAI BOT is not necessary. While it may provide quick responses to questions, the fact that it often answers nonsensically can lead to confusion and frustration for users. It is important for a bot to provide accurate and helpful information in order to be truly useful.

1 like

shady2309
shady albayyouk

I think yes

I think yes

1 like

Adny
Andy Waski
It should be because it broadens and "objectifies" the human, uncensored point of view.
It should be because it broadens and "objectifies" the human, uncensored point of view.

Machine translated

1 like

Marcin89
Marcin Mydlarz
For me, it is unnecessary.
For me, it is unnecessary.

Machine translated

Krzys
Krzysztof Marek

I'm also wondering what this is for

I'm also wondering what this is for

Machine translated

Zdzislaw
Zdzisław Sęk
It is unnecessary, it only creates confusion. You cannot be sure if the topic has been noticed or if it has only been handled by a machine.
It is unnecessary, it only creates confusion. You cannot be sure if the topic has been noticed or if it has only been handled by a machine.

Machine translated

Marrc
Marcin Kukla
Feedback: After reading the comments, I have changed my mind on this topic.
Feedback: After reading the comments, I have changed my mind on this topic.

Machine translated

piter2k1
Piotr Grzesiak
And what if we improve the bot like this: 1. The bot generates a response to a question (just like now) 2. The second iteration asks the bot if its previous answer adds something substantive to the discussion, and if so, then we add its comment, if not, then we don't. This can be easily done technically, and an example that it works is in this thread (the bot itself stated that it is unnecessary). Personally, I believe that GPT can provide a lot, it just needs to be refined ;)
And what if we improve the bot like this: 1. The bot generates a response to a question (just like now) 2. The second iteration asks the bot if its previous answer adds something substantive to the discussion, and if so, then we add its comment, if not, then we don't. This can be easily done technically, and an example that it works is in this thread (the bot itself stated that it is unnecessary). Personally, I believe that GPT can provide a lot, it just needs to be refined ;)

Machine translated