© CCFOUND sp. z o.o. sp.k.

바닥난로: 전기매트 vs 물난로

어떤 종류의 바닥 난방을 추천하시나요? 전기 매트를 사용한 것인가 아니면 수도 설비도 가능한가요?
첫 눈에는 전자가 더 쉬운 설치로 보이지만, 고장이 발생하더라도 아랫층 이웃에 침수될 염려가 없습니다. 그럼에도 불구하고 전기 선만으로는 물보다 열을 덜 지킵니다. 의견 주시면 감사하겠습니다.

어떤 종류의 바닥 난방을 추천하시나요? 전기 매트를 사용한 것인가 아니면 수도 설비도 가능한가요?
첫 눈에는 전자가 더 쉬운 설치로 보이지만, 고장이 발생하더라도 아랫층 이웃에 침수될 염려가 없습니다. 그럼에도 불구하고 전기 선만으로는 물보다 열을 덜 지킵니다. 의견 주시면 감사하겠습니다.

Show original content

1 users upvote it!

6 answers


gbksiazczak

Heat "kept" by pipes or water is negligible compared to the thermal inertia of the surrounding mass of the heating element (ceiling/floor/floor). With neighbors below, I wouldn't risk using water underfloor heating. The only advantage of heating with water is that the source of heat energy can be chosen: electricity, gas, heat pump...

Heat "kept" by pipes or water is negligible compared to the thermal inertia of the surrounding mass of the heating element (ceiling/floor/floor). With neighbors below, I wouldn't risk using water underfloor heating. The only advantage of heating with water is that the source of heat energy can be chosen: electricity, gas, heat pump...

Machine translated


2 likes

zbiwol

I have "underfloor heating" throughout the house, powered by a heat pump (with gas as a backup). A great solution, no radiators. I like to have around 18 degrees in the bedroom, it's easier to sleep then. One must remember about the significant inertia of the heating system, the temperature cannot be quickly raised. Whether it's powered by water or electricity doesn't make much of a difference in terms of heat retention.

I have "underfloor heating" throughout the house, powered by a heat pump (with gas as a backup). A great solution, no radiators. I like to have around 18 degrees in the bedroom, it's easier to sleep then. One must remember about the significant inertia of the heating system, the temperature cannot be quickly raised. Whether it's powered by water or electricity doesn't make much of a difference in terms of heat retention.

Machine translated


1 likes

Jacek

The underfloor heating with water installation is a low temperature system, which means that the water in the installation has a temperature of approximately 25 degrees Celsius to a maximum of around 50 degrees Celsius (we don't drill in the floors :-) ). My tip is to have water installation in the living room, kitchen, and bathrooms, and oversized, low temperature aluminum radiators in the bedrooms (better well-being during sleep).

The underfloor heating with water installation is a low temperature system, which means that the water in the installation has a temperature of approximately 25 degrees Celsius to a maximum of around 50 degrees Celsius (we don't drill in the floors :-) ). My tip is to have water installation in the living room, kitchen, and bathrooms, and oversized, low temperature aluminum radiators in the bedrooms (better well-being during sleep).

Machine translated


mazi88

water underfloor heating connected to a heat pump

water underfloor heating connected to a heat pump

Machine translated


SukcesGo

It depends on your expectations. Are you looking more at safety, for example in terms of the neighbor you are writing about, or are you looking from an economic perspective. In terms of safety, as mentioned earlier, I would choose an electric underfloor heating, while from an economic point of view during operation, I would choose a water underfloor heating. I would like to point out here that, without taking into account the increases in electricity prices, electric underfloor heating would lose here to water heating, especially when the building is not sufficiently warm. If it is an apartment in a block of flats, you probably won't reduce the electricity prices by using photovoltaics, not to mention that two years ago the settlement of photovoltaics with the power plant became less favorable. Everything depends on many factors. As for heat storage, as someone mentioned above and they are right, it is not a heat source that stores heat, but rather the screed-floor.

It depends on your expectations. Are you looking more at safety, for example in terms of the neighbor you are writing about, or are you looking from an economic perspective. In terms of safety, as mentioned earlier, I would choose an electric underfloor heating, while from an economic point of view during operation, I would choose a water underfloor heating. I would like to point out here that, without taking into account the increases in electricity prices, electric underfloor heating would lose here to water heating, especially when the building is not sufficiently warm. If it is an apartment in a block of flats, you probably won't reduce the electricity prices by using photovoltaics, not to mention that two years ago the settlement of photovoltaics with the power plant became less favorable. Everything depends on many factors. As for heat storage, as someone mentioned above and they are right, it is not a heat source that stores heat, but rather the screed-floor.

Machine translated


BONIO2
You can use the water underfloor heating system to cool rooms during the summer, which is an undeniable advantage over electric mats. Additionally, as my predecessors mentioned, water underfloor heating can be powered by multiple sources of energy, not just electricity.
You can use the water underfloor heating system to cool rooms during the summer, which is an undeniable advantage over electric mats. Additionally, as my predecessors mentioned, water underfloor heating can be powered by multiple sources of energy, not just electricity.

Machine translated