Rapporto per investitori e fan di ccFound per il 4° trimestre del 2023

Hello everyone, Congratulations on the CCF's many new ideas and new enthusiasm for work and change. I see that the new functionalities will bring some improvement to the condition of CCF, but I also see their limitations, because I have already conceptualized this many years ago. I am glad to establish new contacts, new decision-makers or advisors that I know. This is valuable information and hope for CCF, I am glad that you have opened up to cooperation with other experts, even in marketing. ----- Analyzing the presented report, I was touched by the declaration of departing from the main stream of CCF, which was the question/answer format. This is the potential that was supposed to drive CCF from the beginning, so the question is: Was the idea that led to the creation of CCF to realize this potential wrong? And the second question: What certainty is there that the current ideas will be better, developmental for CCF? What if we can already recognize today that they are weak, that they have limitations from the beginning, which are important in the current situation, namely the presence of AI in the market and a complete change of the rules, which we do not fully understand, including myself? Generally, the idea is (1.) not to define the goal of development or even the direction (specifically due to AI) and strengthen what already exists. (2.) Focus on the benefits for the recipients rather than the creators. The latter needs a few tools, but they are already available on the internet, there is no need to duplicate them in CCF. The appropriate tools already existed in a simple version in CCF. ------- That's all from me regarding the first impression from the report, of course, it's just a report and I don't know the details. Wise heads know better, and speaking of wisdom, I noticed a contradiction in this declaration in the report, but I might be mistaken, so take a look at it, I quote: "Values" "The highest value of ccFound is truth: it includes, among other things, the pursuit of understanding the surrounding reality, the exchange of experiences and solutions, knowledge and wisdom." "ccFound is a discussion platform." "We are no longer a platform for questions and answers. We want to gather different perspectives. We understand that everyone has their version of the truth and arguments supporting a certain vision of reality." So, will CCF finally clarify this reality and truth, or will it get lost along with the users in its various variations?

Good morning. My name is Chomik and I am a flat-earther. Vivat ccfound! Ps. Will it continue to be called that? Wouldn't it be better to have some other domains in parallel? Like introducing a Theme for questions and answers and a domain, so it's still the same but visually directed towards those who mainly want to ask questions and get answers. You know, the same orangeade, just a label in a different color. Different words on the label for a different group. (They will come to ask, but they will stay for courses and groups, who knows.) It doesn't have to be that the website is only directed towards one group. When I had that domain, ask. or answer. I pasted it on Facebook and someone even registered from it... but when it's written as ccfound.com, you don't know what it means and it looks like spam probably.

Wow, it looks really bad that as an investor I received the last summary for Q4 2022 by email... It doesn't look good that any information is being published only here without any notification system for the quarterly summary. From my perspective, it looks like the project is dead and nothing is happening. In the meantime, something is happening, but few people know about it. I suggest reconsidering this issue and reporting quarterly changes via email - as it was done before. Best regards

@Piotr_Michalak I have spoken on this topic before. Unfortunately, you still don't have anything interesting to offer. For me, it was clear that the original concept wouldn't work. The whole problem was that something was assumed from the top down, a platform was built for a lot of money, and then they tried to convince people to use it. The standard mistake of most startups. Were there any studies confirming that people need this and that it is scalable? Now changing assumptions throws the whole project upside down. You are entering a difficult industry of courses and there doesn't seem to be a clear idea on how to become number 1 quickly. The platform is not prepared for this. Nothing here attracts people, not even the name. It would be better to create a simple job listing portal (like JustJoint) with courses and thematic groups. It will be difficult to stand out and be profitable in a short period of time just with courses. I don't see how... In order for this project to actually make money, you need to do it like JustJoint - a portal, organic work to attract people, salespeople to sell advertisements and thematic training. That would make sense.

Thanks, Peter, for the specifics. I have only one question related to the sentence "We create a paid course about earning on ccFound for them." Maybe, at least in the beginning, such a course should be free? Just to make it easier for creators to start using the platform? Alternatively, a free basic version and a paid extended version? But I'm sure you've already discussed this internally? ;-)

Illustrative photo for the report:

1. Am I seeing correctly that it's Piotr? ;-)
2. Am I guessing correctly that the photo was edited in some AI tool?

No no, it sounds quite good.

How does the tokenization of the platform and entering the stock exchanges affect the holders of Found coins, or the original investors?