© CCFOUND sp. z o.o. sp.k.

Changes in the education system.

Barbara Nowacka, the Minister of Education, announces a reduction in the scope of material in physics, chemistry, geography, history, and Polish language. What do you think about these changes? What would you change in the Polish education system?
Barbara Nowacka, the Minister of Education, announces a reduction in the scope of material in physics, chemistry, geography, history, and Polish language. What do you think about these changes? What would you change in the Polish education system?
Show original content

2 users upvote it!

6 answers


Zubiks
I would get rid of all the keys and top-down programs. We have free education, but the government decides what children should learn... and they cram irrelevant content into their minds and evaluate knowledge based on sheets created by unknown individuals. The PE teacher takes a course and voila, becomes a computer science teacher, someone without basic business knowledge, let alone experience teaching entrepreneurship, and so on. This is called education... the question is, what is the purpose of such a thing? Not long ago, one of the Deputy Ministers of Japan stated that his country used to heavily invest in Poland because technical education here was at a high level, but currently it is lagging behind the changing global trends... it is increasingly difficult to find professionals in this country. Therefore, in my opinion, high schools and higher education institutions should have the ability to create their own offerings for young people, develop their own programs, stand out, and attract those who truly want to learn practical knowledge at a global level, not some nonsense from decades ago. It may not be completely free education but perhaps it would be possible to attract business funding. A real education reform is needed, not some pseudo movements. The same goes for the judiciary, pension system, tax system, and healthcare service. There is a lot to be done wherever you look.
I would get rid of all the keys and top-down programs. We have free education, but the government decides what children should learn... and they cram irrelevant content into their minds and evaluate knowledge based on sheets created by unknown individuals. The PE teacher takes a course and voila, becomes a computer science teacher, someone without basic business knowledge, let alone experience teaching entrepreneurship, and so on. This is called education... the question is, what is the purpose of such a thing? Not long ago, one of the Deputy Ministers of Japan stated that his country used to heavily invest in Poland because technical education here was at a high level, but currently it is lagging behind the changing global trends... it is increasingly difficult to find professionals in this country. Therefore, in my opinion, high schools and higher education institutions should have the ability to create their own offerings for young people, develop their own programs, stand out, and attract those who truly want to learn practical knowledge at a global level, not some nonsense from decades ago. It may not be completely free education but perhaps it would be possible to attract business funding. A real education reform is needed, not some pseudo movements. The same goes for the judiciary, pension system, tax system, and healthcare service. There is a lot to be done wherever you look.

Machine translated


3 likes

CryptoKacper
In my opinion, reducing the scope of material is not a necessary change. In Poland, we can be proud of our education system and how our students compare to those in other countries. When it comes to changes, we should definitely put more emphasis on group work, as it is something that is not well-developed in Polish schools. I am also afraid that the influence of Western ideology will now be reflected in the Polish education system. So far, we have managed to protect ourselves from it, but probably not for long.
In my opinion, reducing the scope of material is not a necessary change. In Poland, we can be proud of our education system and how our students compare to those in other countries. When it comes to changes, we should definitely put more emphasis on group work, as it is something that is not well-developed in Polish schools. I am also afraid that the influence of Western ideology will now be reflected in the Polish education system. So far, we have managed to protect ourselves from it, but probably not for long.

Machine translated


2 likes

gbksiazczak
Bravo minister, give her vodka!!! After all, a doctoral degree is not necessary for picking asparagus. Hitler also limited the education of the Polish subhumans - it was enough for them to be able to draw their own signature.
Bravo minister, give her vodka!!! After all, a doctoral degree is not necessary for picking asparagus. Hitler also limited the education of the Polish subhumans - it was enough for them to be able to draw their own signature.

Machine translated


2 likes

OpenAI BOT
In my opinion, reducing the scope of materials in physics, chemistry, geography, history, and the Polish language in the education system can have both positive and negative consequences. On one hand, reducing the scope of materials can mean a greater focus on specific topics and a deeper understanding of the subjects. Less material means fewer things to learn, which can lead to more precise teaching and better assimilation of knowledge by students. However, there is also a risk that reducing the scope of materials can lead to a shortening and simplification of the curriculum, which can result in gaps in students' knowledge. Physics, chemistry, geography, history, and the Polish language are important subjects that broaden students' knowledge and teach them critical thinking and analysis. Reducing their scope can deprive students of the opportunity to deepen their knowledge in these fields. If I were to introduce changes in the Polish education system, I would focus on increasing the interactivity and practicality of lessons. A more practical approach to learning can help students apply the knowledge they acquire in practice. Additionally, developing critical thinking, teamwork, and communication skills would also be important. It is also crucial to provide proper support for teachers, both in terms of teaching methodology and self-development. Training programs for teachers can help improve the quality of teaching and enrich lessons. In conclusion, reducing the scope of materials in the education system can have both positive and negative effects, so it is important to find a balance between the need to focus on main topics and providing a complete and comprehensive education for students.
In my opinion, reducing the scope of materials in physics, chemistry, geography, history, and the Polish language in the education system can have both positive and negative consequences. On one hand, reducing the scope of materials can mean a greater focus on specific topics and a deeper understanding of the subjects. Less material means fewer things to learn, which can lead to more precise teaching and better assimilation of knowledge by students. However, there is also a risk that reducing the scope of materials can lead to a shortening and simplification of the curriculum, which can result in gaps in students' knowledge. Physics, chemistry, geography, history, and the Polish language are important subjects that broaden students' knowledge and teach them critical thinking and analysis. Reducing their scope can deprive students of the opportunity to deepen their knowledge in these fields. If I were to introduce changes in the Polish education system, I would focus on increasing the interactivity and practicality of lessons. A more practical approach to learning can help students apply the knowledge they acquire in practice. Additionally, developing critical thinking, teamwork, and communication skills would also be important. It is also crucial to provide proper support for teachers, both in terms of teaching methodology and self-development. Training programs for teachers can help improve the quality of teaching and enrich lessons. In conclusion, reducing the scope of materials in the education system can have both positive and negative effects, so it is important to find a balance between the need to focus on main topics and providing a complete and comprehensive education for students.

Machine translated


Anonymous
By the way, minister, is it something like a mistress? Someone with a whip like in porn movies?
By the way, minister, is it something like a mistress? Someone with a whip like in porn movies?

Machine translated


wiktoriazapolska
Changes are needed in practically every area, and reducing the scope of material is a very good step. The next step should be the immediate removal of religion from schools. In addition, we need to put an end to pointless homework assignments that only occupy students' time and do not bring anything good. It is also necessary to build self-confidence, creativity, and group work, but also to put an end to undermining individuals' potential. I remember teachers in my primary school who called children idiots and said they would be digging ditches. Such teachers should be immediately removed from school and "rewarded" with a ban on practicing their profession. Of course, all of this goes hand in hand with salary increases, appropriate education, and rewarding teachers who are good at their job.
Changes are needed in practically every area, and reducing the scope of material is a very good step. The next step should be the immediate removal of religion from schools. In addition, we need to put an end to pointless homework assignments that only occupy students' time and do not bring anything good. It is also necessary to build self-confidence, creativity, and group work, but also to put an end to undermining individuals' potential. I remember teachers in my primary school who called children idiots and said they would be digging ditches. Such teachers should be immediately removed from school and "rewarded" with a ban on practicing their profession. Of course, all of this goes hand in hand with salary increases, appropriate education, and rewarding teachers who are good at their job.

Machine translated