Privacy policy and regulations
EULA
© CCFOUND sp. z o.o. sp.k.
ccFOUND Archive
ccFOUND Archive
Dominika Nowaczyk
•2 years

This is 18+ content

Are you sure you want to see it?

"What do you think, is 800+ a good idea?"

In your opinion, should everyone receive 800+ per child, or only those who work?

In your opinion, should everyone receive 800+ per child, or only those who work?

Show original content

2 users upvote it!

10 answers

Natalia776
Natalia Janke
Only those who work
Only those who work

Machine translated

1 like

Endzi122333
Angelika Krzyżańska
Only those who work
Only those who work

Machine translated

1 like

Adudidu
Anna Skoczeń
Most people drink up this money. They don't have it, they should control and check that this money goes to children and not to alcohol and other things.
Most people drink up this money. They don't have it, they should control and check that this money goes to children and not to alcohol and other things.

Machine translated

Deleted
"Of course those who work 😊"
"Of course those who work 😊"

Machine translated

Anonymous

All children except those who exceed the established income per family member.
If you have children, you cease to be competitive in the job market, you lose availability...

All children except those who exceed the established income per family member.
If you have children, you cease to be competitive in the job market, you lose availability...

Machine translated

Karolina1986
Karolina Karcz-Kostrzyńska
In my opinion, 800+ should only be for families in which at least one parent/guardian is working.
In my opinion, 800+ should only be for families in which at least one parent/guardian is working.

Machine translated

Zubiks
Zbigniew Bartuzi
No. This type of benefit should be completely eliminated.
No. This type of benefit should be completely eliminated.

Machine translated

DominikaWM
Dominika Wac-Majcher

I think that child benefits should be given to unemployed people who are really trying to find a job and to those who work but have a low salary, but I also believe that a good solution would be if there was a system that checks whether the money is really going to the child because some people do not work out of laziness, they take all these child benefits but spend them on their own pleasure while the child goes hungry and wears the same pants.

I think that child benefits should be given to unemployed people who are really trying to find a job and to those who work but have a low salary, but I also believe that a good solution would be if there was a system that checks whether the money is really going to the child because some people do not work out of laziness, they take all these child benefits but spend them on their own pleasure while the child goes hungry and wears the same pants.

Machine translated

OpenAI BOT
OpenAI BOT
In my opinion, the idea of providing 800 plus for a child to everyone, regardless of whether they are employed, makes sense. It is a form of financial support that can help families with the costs of raising and maintaining a child. Introducing this type of program can have positive social effects. It provides equal opportunities and equal rights because every family receives the same support, regardless of their employment status. It is also a form of assistance for those families who may have limited income but are not eligible for other social benefits. However, there are also arguments against it. Some may argue that such universal financial support may discourage some individuals from working or acquiring qualifications because they may feel satisfactorily content with the financial aid they receive. They may also fear that this will lead to system abuse and an increase in budget deficit. Ultimately, this is a matter for debate. It is important to consider different perspectives and analyze both the benefits and potential risks. The decision to implement such a program should be based on thorough economic and social analysis and take into account the needs and goals of the country.
In my opinion, the idea of providing 800 plus for a child to everyone, regardless of whether they are employed, makes sense. It is a form of financial support that can help families with the costs of raising and maintaining a child. Introducing this type of program can have positive social effects. It provides equal opportunities and equal rights because every family receives the same support, regardless of their employment status. It is also a form of assistance for those families who may have limited income but are not eligible for other social benefits. However, there are also arguments against it. Some may argue that such universal financial support may discourage some individuals from working or acquiring qualifications because they may feel satisfactorily content with the financial aid they receive. They may also fear that this will lead to system abuse and an increase in budget deficit. Ultimately, this is a matter for debate. It is important to consider different perspectives and analyze both the benefits and potential risks. The decision to implement such a program should be based on thorough economic and social analysis and take into account the needs and goals of the country.

Machine translated

DominikSz
Dominik Szastak

Hello,

I also benefit from the 800 plus program because I have two children. Personally, I believe that the government should support young people in raising children.

However, I think that the support should be for working individuals. Both the mother and father should work unless the health of one of the children prevents them from doing so. In that case, one of the parents should be exempt from the obligation to work. Exemptions should also apply to families with more than three children.

I strongly believe that we are creating a pathology in our society. I observe the community and I see that many people use this money to support themselves, letting go of work. I am talking about people who rely on social benefits.

I suspect that such limitations will be introduced because the government will not be able to afford these payments, especially considering the influx of people from poorer countries to Poland.

Similar systems already exist. My family moved to Norway, where there is a similar program. If both the mother and father are working, they are entitled to full social benefits for their children. If they are not working, they are not entitled to anything. This way, we do not support unproductive people who do not contribute anything to the Polish society with state funds.

Hello,

I also benefit from the 800 plus program because I have two children. Personally, I believe that the government should support young people in raising children.

However, I think that the support should be for working individuals. Both the mother and father should work unless the health of one of the children prevents them from doing so. In that case, one of the parents should be exempt from the obligation to work. Exemptions should also apply to families with more than three children.

I strongly believe that we are creating a pathology in our society. I observe the community and I see that many people use this money to support themselves, letting go of work. I am talking about people who rely on social benefits.

I suspect that such limitations will be introduced because the government will not be able to afford these payments, especially considering the influx of people from poorer countries to Poland.

Similar systems already exist. My family moved to Norway, where there is a similar program. If both the mother and father are working, they are entitled to full social benefits for their children. If they are not working, they are not entitled to anything. This way, we do not support unproductive people who do not contribute anything to the Polish society with state funds.

Machine translated