What do you think about the distinction of ccFound groups on the social media market - what do you think?

My dear ones, we are in the process of preparing the functionality of open groups on ccFound. We want to limit their number so that there are not 100 groups about the same thing. Additionally, the only differentiating factor is the translation of post content into other languages, which enables communication with people from all over the world. We are wondering if this is enough. A bolder idea has emerged... Slogan: ccFound - "connecting people better" - a clear reference to Nokia. Product: Access to groups that matter. All groups, even open ones (content visible from the outside), cost a minimum of $2 per month for access (for the right to speak up). This means that users will not join 1500 groups that they will never use, but will choose 2-3 groups they really want to be in. This means that in a good group, there won't be 60 thousand inactive people and trolls, but 600 individuals writing valuable posts. From this amount ($2), we allocate half to group administrators on Facebook, encouraging them to move their communities to us - they receive a $1 commission per person per month. Does it make sense? Would you pay for access to your favorite groups? Do you think this could solve the problem of low-quality comments in existing groups?