Martin Armstrong: Analysis of Business Cycles and Economic Confidence Model
Martin Armstrong is an American analyst who developed a mathematical model aimed at predicting economic cycles and potential market crashes. His theory is based on historical data regarding crises around the world from 1683 to 1907.
Beginnings and Career
Armstrong is a self-taught individual who started his journey as a teenager, working in a numismatic shop. His first forecasts regarding the commodity market were published in 1973. In 1983, he began publishing a paid newsletter, focusing on analyses and predictions of events in the commodity market.
Economic Confidence Model
Armstrong's model assumes that economic cycles occur every 8.6 years. At the end of each cycle, a crisis appears, followed by an improvement in the economic situation until the next crisis point. Analyzing historical financial panics over a period of 224 years (between 1683 and 1907) yields a frequency of about 8.6 years. Armstrong claims that six complete cycles of 8.6 years lead to a larger cycle of 51.6 years.
Criticism of Armstrong's Theory
However, critics of Martin Armstrong's theory raise several significant objections: Lack of scientific confirmation: Despite years of research and analysis, Armstrong's theory lacks definitive scientific validation. Some consider it pseudoscience, and its results as random.
- Lack of flexibility: Armstrong's model is based on fixed cycle periods, which may not account for changes in the economy and technology. Reality is more complex than mathematical models.
- Selectivity of data: Critics argue that Armstrong selected data that confirmed his theory while ignoring those that contradicted it. This can lead to erroneous conclusions.
- Lack of consistency in predictions: Not all of Armstrong's predictions were accurate. Sometimes his forecasts contradicted reality.
- Overly general assumptions: Armstrong's model is very general and does not take into account specific economic or political contexts.
It is worth noting, however, that Armstrong's theory still generates interest and is a subject of discussion in the economic community.
Martin Armstrong is an American analyst who developed a mathematical model aimed at predicting economic cycles and potential market crashes. His theory is based on historical data regarding crises around the world from 1683 to 1907.
Beginnings and Career
Armstrong is a self-taught individual who started his journey as a teenager, working in a numismatic shop. His first forecasts regarding the commodity market were published in 1973. In 1983, he began publishing a paid newsletter, focusing on analyses and predictions of events in the commodity market.
Economic Confidence Model
Armstrong's model assumes that economic cycles occur every 8.6 years. At the end of each cycle, a crisis appears, followed by an improvement in the economic situation until the next crisis point. Analyzing historical financial panics over a period of 224 years (between 1683 and 1907) yields a frequency of about 8.6 years. Armstrong claims that six complete cycles of 8.6 years lead to a larger cycle of 51.6 years.
Criticism of Armstrong's Theory
However, critics of Martin Armstrong's theory raise several significant objections: Lack of scientific confirmation: Despite years of research and analysis, Armstrong's theory lacks definitive scientific validation. Some consider it pseudoscience, and its results as random.
- Lack of flexibility: Armstrong's model is based on fixed cycle periods, which may not account for changes in the economy and technology. Reality is more complex than mathematical models.
- Selectivity of data: Critics argue that Armstrong selected data that confirmed his theory while ignoring those that contradicted it. This can lead to erroneous conclusions.
- Lack of consistency in predictions: Not all of Armstrong's predictions were accurate. Sometimes his forecasts contradicted reality.
- Overly general assumptions: Armstrong's model is very general and does not take into account specific economic or political contexts.
It is worth noting, however, that Armstrong's theory still generates interest and is a subject of discussion in the economic community.
0 users upvote it!
0 answers