Privacy policy and regulations
EULA
© CCFOUND sp. z o.o. sp.k.
ccFOUND Archive
ccFOUND Archive
Pawel Adamski
•1 year

What can the pace of development of the CCFOUND portal be compared to?

125 USERS per month 30 PRODUCTS per month I look as usual through the lens of educational development. This gives us 1 product and 4 users per day. At this pace, I'm afraid we won't catch up with Google. I heard in interviews that we are building a counterweight to Google. And don't tell me it's the users' fault. With the budget we had, I expected a better bang. Straight to the point, although there are probably no bold owners of this entity here anymore - PLANS? ADVERTISEMENT? Will you answer me, Piotr - Paweł, don't go crazy, it's your business, not mine - I gave you the fishing rod and you catch the fish. But this rod seems a bit prehistoric and you didn't provide me with any bait;)
125 USERS per month 30 PRODUCTS per month I look as usual through the lens of educational development. This gives us 1 product and 4 users per day. At this pace, I'm afraid we won't catch up with Google. I heard in interviews that we are building a counterweight to Google. And don't tell me it's the users' fault. With the budget we had, I expected a better bang. Straight to the point, although there are probably no bold owners of this entity here anymore - PLANS? ADVERTISEMENT? Will you answer me, Piotr - Paweł, don't go crazy, it's your business, not mine - I gave you the fishing rod and you catch the fish. But this rod seems a bit prehistoric and you didn't provide me with any bait;)
Show original content

10 users upvote it!

10 answers

g
Grzegorz Książczak
I wouldn't expect too much of plans (because there are many of them here, on every quarterly occasion) but rather visible results of implementing these plans. The first quarter of the 21st century is ending and we still have a shabby graphic design, poor functionality, and plenty of errors/flaws. In my opinion, these are poorly invested money and negligence of tfurcuf (don't be fooled by PM's pathetic texts from time to time).
I wouldn't expect too much of plans (because there are many of them here, on every quarterly occasion) but rather visible results of implementing these plans. The first quarter of the 21st century is ending and we still have a shabby graphic design, poor functionality, and plenty of errors/flaws. In my opinion, these are poorly invested money and negligence of tfurcuf (don't be fooled by PM's pathetic texts from time to time).

Machine translated

2 likes

g
Grzegorz Książczak
Snail attack on the "temporary" 1900 tower in Paris.
Snail attack on the "temporary" 1900 tower in Paris.

Machine translated

2 likes

K
Krzysztof Jankowski
I agree - badly invested money, if there was a possibility I would withdraw (what I put in). I will add - Support is also a bit weak (maybe just in relation to me). Best regards
I agree - badly invested money, if there was a possibility I would withdraw (what I put in). I will add - Support is also a bit weak (maybe just in relation to me). Best regards

Machine translated

2 likes

b
jan dzban
Good question
Good question

Machine translated

1 like

s
Support ccFOUND
In this article, Piotr addresses our current plans and struggles: https://ccfound.com/pl/articles/12579/co-teraz-robimy-ccfound-szybka-aktualizacja-27-05-2024 We are constantly working on acquiring users :).
In this article, Piotr addresses our current plans and struggles: https://ccfound.com/pl/articles/12579/co-teraz-robimy-ccfound-szybka-aktualizacja-27-05-2024 We are constantly working on acquiring users :).

Machine translated

https://ccfound.com/pl/artic...

1 like

Anonymous
Is Octavius a turtle?
Is Octavius a turtle?

Machine translated

W
Paweł Witt
Again, no response, no real marketing, almost nothing is happening on X, as if it was supposed to work on its own
Again, no response, no real marketing, almost nothing is happening on X, as if it was supposed to work on its own

Machine translated

u
Deniz Utku

I think this startup has failed and the team has accepted that. It was already clear from the development of the portal that this was going to happen. In the first listing, a lucky few investors were able to get their money back. They are still stalling with staking. The token price dropped to $0.0025. Trading volume is almost zero. There is no new cex listing. With staking, they lock tokens for 6 months or even 1 year. The revenue generated is a funny value with this performance of $found. I think the only thing left now is to declare the project bankrupt. Extra time in the match

I think this startup has failed and the team has accepted that. It was already clear from the development of the portal that this was going to happen. In the first listing, a lucky few investors were able to get their money back. They are still stalling with staking. The token price dropped to $0.0025. Trading volume is almost zero. There is no new cex listing. With staking, they lock tokens for 6 months or even 1 year. The revenue generated is a funny value with this performance of $found. I think the only thing left now is to declare the project bankrupt. Extra time in the match

L
Filip Jaszczuk
We were not able to attract an investor for the development of the portal, so the creators are struggling. Normally, this type of portals require millions for advertising and development. I have the impression that the choice of a new technology related to crypto does not help in rapid development either. The new technology involves a small number of people who are familiar with it, which results in higher salaries for employees and higher costs of implementing changes on the portal. And now we are somewhat caught in a vicious circle - there is no money to hire more programmers, so the portal's improvement is slow, the portal does not meet requirements so it doesn't make sense to advertise it, there is no advertising so there are few users, a small number of users do not encourage use. I hope that the creators will be able to break this vicious circle and the portal will grow. It is known that beginnings are the most difficult.
We were not able to attract an investor for the development of the portal, so the creators are struggling. Normally, this type of portals require millions for advertising and development. I have the impression that the choice of a new technology related to crypto does not help in rapid development either. The new technology involves a small number of people who are familiar with it, which results in higher salaries for employees and higher costs of implementing changes on the portal. And now we are somewhat caught in a vicious circle - there is no money to hire more programmers, so the portal's improvement is slow, the portal does not meet requirements so it doesn't make sense to advertise it, there is no advertising so there are few users, a small number of users do not encourage use. I hope that the creators will be able to break this vicious circle and the portal will grow. It is known that beginnings are the most difficult.

Machine translated

M
Matt Potgieter

Totally agree. I had such big hopes for this project as my profession is Educational technology. Had huge potnetial but worry that focus is not being placed on the actuall things that could change the paltforms current trajectory.

Totally agree. I had such big hopes for this project as my profession is Educational technology. Had huge potnetial but worry that focus is not being placed on the actuall things that could change the paltforms current trajectory.