•1 year
Is reactivating paid questions and answers with a paywall on ccFound a big issue?
Of course, this is a question for the team creating the platform, but if anyone has their own two cents to add, please write. I ask this in the context of traffic on the platform. Because in my opinion, this traffic is somewhat stagnating. In my opinion, during periods when paid questions were systematically added by various users (including ccFound itself - on various topics), even though the monetary rewards for answers were not large, it somehow encouraged participation on the platform. This generated traffic, generated content, so people visited more often because maybe there is a paid question for which they will receive some fvUSD. It was also a bit of a marketing ploy for the portal - that you can earn money here by answering other people's questions. Maybe outstanding specialists did not fall for it (I know, it sounds bad), but people did, they wrote what they thought, and received fvUSD for it. It was evident that it was alive, that people were actively writing here. I believe that these paid questions and answers hidden behind a paywall are a crucial element of this platform, which was part of its original concept, was its differentiator from all other platforms, and was a pretext for attracting new users and generating content. In my opinion, this is now lacking. Is it a big problem (legal, tax, any other) to restore this?
Of course, this is a question for the team creating the platform, but if anyone has their own two cents to add, please write. I ask this in the context of traffic on the platform. Because in my opinion, this traffic is somewhat stagnating. In my opinion, during periods when paid questions were systematically added by various users (including ccFound itself - on various topics), even though the monetary rewards for answers were not large, it somehow encouraged participation on the platform. This generated traffic, generated content, so people visited more often because maybe there is a paid question for which they will receive some fvUSD. It was also a bit of a marketing ploy for the portal - that you can earn money here by answering other people's questions. Maybe outstanding specialists did not fall for it (I know, it sounds bad), but people did, they wrote what they thought, and received fvUSD for it. It was evident that it was alive, that people were actively writing here. I believe that these paid questions and answers hidden behind a paywall are a crucial element of this platform, which was part of its original concept, was its differentiator from all other platforms, and was a pretext for attracting new users and generating content. In my opinion, this is now lacking. Is it a big problem (legal, tax, any other) to restore this?
Show original content
4 users upvote it!
1 answer
Popular
T
I think this is one of the many mysteries of this portal. As if its development has slightly stopped and is crawling further. Compared to Google (not my words), even Google hasn't noticed that such a domain exists
I think this is one of the many mysteries of this portal. As if its development has slightly stopped and is crawling further. Compared to Google (not my words), even Google hasn't noticed that such a domain exists
Machine translated
1 like