Who rules the world?

I recommend your attention to the text by Prof. Piotr Jaroszyński from 2012. "Even just asking such a question can be accused of one of the greatest crimes, which is preaching a conspiracy theory of history. "Conspiracy" is the key word that paralyzes our search for who rules the world, and if we discover something, we must not dare to proclaim it publicly. And if someone dares, they will be sentenced to public ostracism as a delusional and unserious person. Despite the many threats that await supporters of conspiracy theories of history, it is still worth mentioning a few examples where, after years, we were able to realize that there was indeed a conspiracy. There was a conspiracy between Russia and Prussia regarding the partitions of Poland, later joined by Austria. It was not the case that chaos in Poland resulted from the flaws of drunken nobility, and our benevolent neighbors took pity on us and decided to help us. They deliberated secretly, step by step, on how to take over Poland at the lowest cost, bite by bite. And they succeeded. And they imposed an official version on us, which still prevails today. The second example is the Ribbentrop-Molotov Pact signed on August 23, 1939, as part of an agreement of cooperation between Germany and the Soviet Union. The agreement was official, but the pact, which simply meant the partition of Poland, was kept secret. Wasn't this meeting with such far-reaching consequences that we still feel today, because thanks to this treaty, the Soviets seized one-third of the territory of the Second Polish Republic and did not return it – wasn't that a conspiracy? And the Round Table, which is officially presented as the definitive collapse of the communist system, the victory of "Solidarity," and the recovery of independence, when in fact it meant the reformation of the ranks within the communist system, allowing this system not only to maintain but also to strengthen and expand its influence, which we also feel to this day – wasn't that a conspiracy? Such examples can be multiplied endlessly. On what basis does the question arise: who rules the world? Above all, it is based on the fact that democracy is becoming more and more illusory. Democracy, which should guarantee sovereignty and thus the independence of different communities on a micro and macro scale, is reduced only to the possibility of voting. But what happens before elections, during elections, and after elections has little in common with democracy. Before elections, not everyone who wants to run can be on the list. There is someone who decides, although the voter does not know who, and the candidate does not have to know. Election campaigns cost money, and someone may sponsor various candidates. During elections, fraud is possible at all levels, including computer data transmission. And finally, after the elections, elected candidates or political parties strangely forget (?) about their election program and implement a completely different program (or maybe a plan?). This was the case with AWS, and it is the case with PO. Where does this plan come from? Maybe from the outside? Maybe from those who rule the world? It would be ridiculous to point fingers at who rules the world, even if we accidentally hit the mark. It is known that the matter is more complicated, involving various entities, more or less overt. Here are some examples: at the head of global organizations, there is the United Nations, which has its important agendas covering education, science, culture (UNESCO – United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization), trade and development (UNCTAD – United Nations Conference on Trade and Development), development and children's health (UNICEF – United Nations International Children's Emergency Fund), assistance to liberated areas in Europe and Asia (UNRRA – United Nations Relief and Rehabilitation Administration), health (WHO – World Health Organization). There are also economic organizations such as the WTO (World Trade Organization), World Bank, OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development), the Club of Rome, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Bilderberg Group, and others. These organizations operate on an international, supranational, and global level, infiltrating legislative, financial, educational, or media systems, thus binding nations for a longer period than the term of a member of parliament or president. Furthermore, behind these lofty names, dangerous practices may be hidden. For example, the World Health Organization, in its concern for maternal health, promotes methods of "safe abortion." But is the unborn child also safe in that case? There are more questions like these. Before we find out who truly rules the world, it is worth realizing who does not rule the world or rules less and less in those states where it holds legal power. The most striking thing is that behind the facade of democracy, there is a loss of natural human and national sovereignty. And yet, this sovereignty should be protected to the fullest extent. Governments that rule the world by disregarding or against the sovereignty of humans and nations must sooner or later become a government over the world, a totalitarian government. There can be no consent to such a government; sovereignty must not be renounced. Prof. Piotr Jaroszyński Head of the Department of Philosophy at KUL"