Nobel Prize laureate in the field of physics: "There is no climate threat." This is corruption of science!

One of the giants of modern science, Dr. John Clauser, has signed the World Climate Declaration (WCD), which states that there is no climate emergency. Dr. Clauser is last year's Nobel laureate in physics and has recently rocked the climate industry by stating that the popular climate narrative reflects "dangerous corruption of science that threatens the global economy and the well-being of billions of people." The WCD argues that climate science has turned into a discussion based on beliefs rather than solid critical science. In August of last year, the Daily Skeptic drew attention to the WCD in an article that went viral on social media. The WCD was compared to the Great Barrington Declaration (GBD), which presented the views of prominent medical scientists who opposed the catastrophic lockdown episode of Covid. Like the GBD, the WCD has been ignored by mainstream politicians and media. However, since August of last year, it has attracted an additional 500 signatories, and the current list counts 1609 scientists and specialists. Over 300 scientists at the professor level have signed the list, and Clauser is the second Nobel laureate in physics to lend support. The WCD maintains that climate research must place much greater emphasis on empirical science. Clauser recently told a group of young Korean scientists that they must proceed according to the scientific method, based on good observations and experiments. Good observations always take precedence over purely speculative theory. Regarding climate science, he noted that the world is "literally awash, saturated with pseudoscience, bad science, scientific misinformation." At a time when UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres claimed that the world has entered an era of "global boiling," Clauser expressed the opinion that the UN-funded IPCC "is one of the worst sources of dangerous misinformation." The WCD is scathing in its criticism of the "established" climate narrative, which has been relentlessly compiled for decades to promote the extremist Net Zero agenda. It points out that climate models are "not at all credible as global policy tools." It is said that they "blow up" the greenhouse gas effect, such as carbon dioxide, and "ignore the fact that enriching the atmosphere with CO2 is beneficial." There is no statistical evidence that global warming exacerbates natural disasters, and there is no climate emergency. There is no reason for panic and anxiety, it advises. But of course, panic and alarm play a significant role in pushing the collectivist Net Zero agenda. As Clauser notes, "Improper climate science has caused the spillover into mass, shocking pseudoscientific journalism." Among the recent signatories of the WCD are many distinguished scientists: • Retired Professor Michael Wilson, former Executive Dean of the University of Western Sydney. Over 30 years of teaching and research in environmental chemistry. • Retired Associate Professor of Chemistry Neils Harrrit, University of Copenhagen. • Dr. Hendrik Schlesing, who has been working at Huggard Consulting Group for 30 years on various scientific issues, including international environmental impact. • Dr. Stefano Gallozzi, a researcher at the Italian Institute of Astrophysics Astronomical Observatory in Rome and President of the Safeguarding Astronomical Sky Foundation. • Paul PA Mazza, Associate Professor of Quaternary Geology, Paleontology, and Archeozoology at the University of Florence. • Professor of Physics Julian Schins, an expert in near-infrared spectroscopy at the Delft University of Technology. • Mikael Lindgren, Professor of Physics at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology, specializing in optics and spectroscopy. • Isabel Lopez Garcia, Assistant Professor of Physical Chemistry and Applied Thermodynamics at the University of Cordoba. • Dr. MM Ali, a senior scientist at the Atmospheric and Atmospheric Research Forecasting Center at Florida State University. Dr. Ali's research interests include interactions between the ocean and the atmosphere, with a particular focus on wind stresses and heat content in the ocean. The WCD is the work of the Clintel Foundation, an organization in the Netherlands that is increasingly influential in combating bad science promoting the unfeasible political ideology of Net Zero. Earlier this year, it published an in-depth and highly critical review of the IPCC's latest sixth assessment reports. It was found that the IPCC had rewritten the climate history, emphasized worse-case scenarios, and exhibited "enormous bias" in favor of bad news. The WCD revealed the shocking fact that 42% of its claims regarding impact are based on an unlikely temperature rise of 5°C in less than 80 years, which even the UN considers to be of "low probability." Worse still, it was revealed that about half of all scientific articles on climate relied on these unlikely assumptions. Source: dailysceptic.org