Will the gods return to earth to punish humanity?

Many new discoveries in archeology and anthropology relate precisely to the evolutionary history of modern humans, and when the theory of evolution loses its raison d'etre, a real cultural revolution occurs, as many specialists declare.

The extra-African theory thus goes down in history and a path is cleared that allows experts to re-evaluate the world's ancient mythologies, as Dr. Carl Sagan has already called for. It speaks of supernatural beings, gods or humanoid aliens such as the Anunnaki who created humans in their image. There are also reasons to believe that the theory of intelligent design in nature will continue to grow in popularity and may soon find its way into the textbooks.

Then it would also be possible to give greater credibility to religious accounts of the origin of life. After all, these traditions also originate from Sumerian and Babylonian traditions. For example, the Sumerian creation story in Genesis Eridu or the Epic of Gilgamesh.

The origin of Eridu was recorded on a fragmentary clay tablet that was found in 1893. In the translated text we read that gods such as Anu, Enlil and Enki created the Sumerians themselves, as well as their animals and the necessary conditions for life and reproduction. These gods descended from heaven and founded the first cities, such as Eridu.

Ancient artifacts recovered from Sumer show remnants of a technologically advanced civilization, there is no evidence of where these advanced skills came from unless there was outside help. For example, there are clay batteries that still contain electrodes. There are models of flying machines, images of rockets or inexplicably precisely cut stone blocks from which great buildings and cities were erected.

In addition to ancient clay tablets with Sumerian texts, similar traditions about gods who visited the earth can be found in many other places around the world. Legends of the Great Flood are particularly famous, and gods such as the Anunnaki are held responsible for using it to eliminate the first humans they genetically created.

The Zulus in Africa have their own history, according to which beings who came from outer space dug gold and other resources, and in these mines the "first men" had to toil as slaves of the gods. Meanwhile, really ancient mines have been discovered there, which may be hundreds of thousands of years old.

The Aztecs say that beings once came from the sky who told them to look for gold. People then began to bind the heads of their babies so that they would grow like the long skulls of the ancient gods.
During the period when the acceptance of these descriptions in the society was still growing, articles appeared in popular science publications strikingly similar in formulating the theory that extraterrestrial visitors in the form of Ancient Aliens may have been the founders of ancient civilizations, hiding not only pseudo-archaeological, but even racist motives.

Although all ancient records speak of gods from the sky who built not only the first human cities, but also massive megalithic structures such as ziggurats and pyramids. To this day, it is impossible to recreate the Great Pyramid of Giza, which is why many archaeologists wonder how it could have been originally built.

The mainstream theories that the primitive cultures of North Africa were capable of this are unconvincing. Especially scientists and authors who try to explain the construction of the monuments of the Giza complex with the intervention of extraterrestrial forces are tempted to accuse them of racism , because they point out that similar pyramids have not been built anywhere on the continent except in North Africa.

Alternative researchers, as well as some mainstream colleagues, wonder if conventional archeology is trying to hide something, as its propagandists say that all alternative explanations belong to pseudo archeology , which is useful to white nationalists. They question the alleged achievements of the BIPOC (Black, Indigenous, and People of Color) community.

According to the skeptical arguments of science journalists, these alleged pseudoscientific concepts of an extremely skewed view of the established historiography and genetic origins of the builders and early rulers of the first historically advanced civilizations are based not only on archaeological discoveries in the USA in the 19th century.

Thousands of pyramid-shaped burial mounds were explored during this time, which apparently were not of Native American origin, but according to Native American lore, were built by a now unknown antecedent culture of white giants whose origin cannot be explained, although the skulls and skeletons of these giants are still preserved in museums for analysis.

The Out-of-Africa theory and history of America's colonization today rests on an ethnic prejudice that basically holds that white peoples were not responsible for the ancient achievements found, although there is evidence that the members of these cultures were white people and blue eyes, were provided not only by facial reconstructions of ancient skulls, but also long ago by DNA analysis.

Members of the ancient civilizations of Egypt, Mesopotamia and America have passed on the most important traditions for thousands of years and claim that their cultures were created by gods who descended from heaven after the catastrophe of the global flood. The DNA evidence predates the publication of skeptical articles about racism in archaeology, and these skeptical science journalists say nothing about it.

They failed to mention that a large proportion of all Western European white men are genetically closely related to ancient Egyptians such as Pharaoh Tutankhamun.

Because Egyptian mummies are often perfectly preserved, they make ideal subjects for genetic analysis. Mummies from different millennia have been studied, and each time geneticists have come to the surprising conclusion that they belonged to non-African populations and usually had to be assigned to a European genotype. The same goes for ancient populations from Mesopotamia, India, and long-skulled skeletons from South America.
Many ancient cultures had a complicated hierarchy of gods and goddesses, and these powerful entities played the most important role because they were seen as the creators of everything. Many of these gods are depicted in human appearance. The appearance of representatives of the gods and rulers of these early civilizations was strikingly often preserved for posterity in the form of white statues with bright blue eyes.

In many ancient civilizations, blue eyes were considered a sign of the gods. There is a great effort by the scientific establishment to attribute all the inexplicable achievements of ancient civilizations to so-called to BIPOC communities for racist reasons, although counter evidence has been available for decades. The established theories were, of course, deliberately invented and consciously used for ideological or political purposes.

Experts who take a stand against the theory of evolution are not only criticized but accused of racism.

Scientific journals have just reported on a new study from Israel that suggests that disbelief in hypothetical human evolution leads to racism, when the opposite is likely. People skeptical about the unprovable ideas of evolutionists are accused of discriminating against black people, migrants and members of the LGBTQ community.

According to them, the rejection of evolution is also a form of so-called white supremacy. Such groups of people are said to be composed of politically motivated creationists who generally believe in God's creation of nature. They are more likely to accept descriptions of the Bible or ancient texts and reject homosexual behavior. In this way, religious morality is equated with ethnic hatred. However, sociologists have found that the dogmatic belief in Darwinian evolution is more closely related to racism because Charles Darwin himself spoke out on the subject.

Evolutionists argue that the belief in a hypothetical common ancestor of all African people is to increase the tendency to identify with all mankind in general. Although new evidence is emerging year after year that could disprove the Extra-African theory, other theories such as multi-regional evolution are also off the table as early human remains have also been discovered in Asia. The absolute focus on the African theory has very specific reasons.

According to experts, there is a strong connection between the theory of evolution and political systems such as communism and fascism, movements that have claimed many millions of lives in the last century. According to historians, there is no denying that the theory of evolution had a strong influence on the politics of the 20th century. If evolution were ever true, certain groups of people are more privileged than others because they should be more highly evolved. Thus, they would be better than other groups of people. This superiority in turn leads to worse treatment of less developed populations.

Keep in mind that evolution is an atheistic belief that does not assume a supreme being, creator, or intelligent design in the cosmos or in nature. If accepted, there is no basis for morality, free will, or spirituality. There is no good, evil and sin, because the universe was created as a result of a cosmic accident, and the existence of man has no purpose and has no deeper meaning.

A moral and virtuous life promotes good relations between different groups and thus contributes to greater peace and the common good than vice versa. Skeptics and stubborn evolutionists have ignored the counter-arguments of dissidents, intelligent design, creationists, and generally religiously oriented scientists for decades. In most cases, their findings and arguments are completely excluded from the scientific conversation.

The biggest problem for the scientific community remains that it can't produce convincing evidence for the history of evolution, because it's nowhere to be found.

Instead, a reverse racism against culturally superior white peoples is perpetuated today, even though no accounts of the black people founding our human civilization can be found in even the largest collections of textbooks.

On the contrary, the creators of culture and the founders of the first historical advanced civilizations are described as white deities and creators of culture by indigenous cultures in all parts of the world. And these traditions are consistent with an alternative interpretation by recognized experts that these enigmatic culture bearers either belonged to a lost, technologically advanced terrestrial precivilization such as Atlantis, or came here from other planets and star systems.

We are currently witnessing the collapse of the mainstream ideology of evolutionism. Why are we not considering teaching other viewpoints on the origin of humanity, or at least including them in textbooks as alternative explanatory models? Perhaps a synthesis of alternative viewpoints along the lines of Ancient Aliens, religious creationism, and evidence for intelligent design can emerge that will ultimately be able to answer many of the world's most important unsolved questions convincingly and logically?

What if the first people did not come from Africa, but from the garden of Eden, as in the story of Adam and Eve, derived from the Sumerian creation myths, according to which the first people were created in the image of God. Did the Anunnaki deities create different populations for different tasks separately through the genetic manipulation of early terrestrial humans and extraterrestrial DNA as Ancient Alien theorists claim?
Many governments around the world do not tolerate teaching other than evolution in their educational institutions, and this fact alone shows that alternative worldviews are not respected. This is despite the fact that half of the population of the nations of the Western world are now convinced of the existence of extraterrestrial visitors in ancient times, and fewer and fewer of them trust established scientific points of view.

Only when the connection of atheism, communism, neo-Marxism and racism to the teaching of evolution is brought to the fore, it will be possible to reconsider the true ideology of this racism. If alternative teaching models can eventually find their way into educational institutions, it will be possible for them to have a greater impact on contemporary culture.

Another sign of racism in the theory of evolution that scholarly articles point to is that Stone Age people are almost always depicted as heroic white hunter-gatherers. These aspects are certainly true of Neanderthals and Cro-Magnons, and to date there is no evidence that early humans in Europe were ever black.

Nor is there any evidence that modern humans ever evolved from an unknown hominid. Equating a rational man with an animal is not conducive to the social and moral progress of contemporary Western civilization, which is based on Christian foundations and values.

The statement that we should rethink our relationship to the past to enable racial equality in the present only gains meaning by equating evolutionist ideology with scientific facts. We are now seeing an intensifying debate in educational institutions about systemic racism, which primarily means discrimination against white people.

As I said, established evolutionists are now pointing out that they doubt the principles of Social Darwinism and the theory of evolution. How is unintended evolution in the universe supposed to produce living and intelligent beings from stardust? How and when did the first complex chemical and biological structures form as a result of unknown natural processes?

Why, after more than a century of intensive research, are evolutionists unable to provide fundamental evidence for their theories, but the opposite happens? Why aren't the manuals redacted to indicate this?

It takes a designer to create functioning and adapted complex biological mechanisms, just as a watchmaker builds a mechanism. And it is about such supernatural creators that ancient traditions and thousand-year-old religious texts inform. The next step in this culture war, according to alternative researchers, is to work on new models of empowering society and creating positive effects capable of eliminating systemic racism against whites.

In conclusion, it is evolutionists, skeptics, and members of the scientific establishment who vehemently dismiss theories of visits by ancient alien space travelers as conspiracy theories or a new UFO religion, but will ultimately succumb to real scientific and archaeological evidence. The UFO phenomenon is an indication that the return of the gods may be coming soon.