© CCFOUND sp. z o.o. sp.k.

Answer accuracy - Answer accuracy

@Support_ccFOUND @PiotrMichalak I suggest that CCF should add a feature in every post under Replies called: Answer accuracy - which would indicate the accuracy of the answer. This would not be the end of the discussion but a calculation of the accuracy of the answers. It would give the impression of summarizing the topic because the algorithm would measure all the answers and provide their accuracy in %, and it could also be shown as a progress bar. I started this topic here: https://ccfound.com/pl/questions/11143/nie-ma-zakonczenia-postow-niech-ccfound-zyska-przewage?searchCommentPath=%5B60947%5D
@Support_ccFOUND @PiotrMichalak I suggest that CCF should add a feature in every post under Replies called: Answer accuracy - which would indicate the accuracy of the answer. This would not be the end of the discussion but a calculation of the accuracy of the answers. It would give the impression of summarizing the topic because the algorithm would measure all the answers and provide their accuracy in %, and it could also be shown as a progress bar. I started this topic here: https://ccfound.com/pl/questions/11143/nie-ma-zakonczenia-postow-niech-ccfound-zyska-przewage?searchCommentPath=%5B60947%5D
https://ccfound.com/pl/quest...
Show original content

2 users upvote it!

2 answers


supportccfound
Thank you for the suggestion! We will definitely consider it and discuss such a suggestion, it seems interesting. However, please remember that we work according to priorities, and at the moment we are focusing on the upcoming listing. Again, thank you - we appreciate your involvement! :D

Thank you for the suggestion! We will definitely consider it and discuss such a suggestion, it seems interesting. However, please remember that we work according to priorities, and at the moment we are focusing on the upcoming listing. Again, thank you - we appreciate your involvement! :D

Machine translated


Piotr Michalak
Thank you for bringing up the topic again, I actually missed your previous post. I read the comments on the previous thread and you respond to many people's doubts with a copy-paste "I aim at giving the accuracy of the answer, which would give the impression of summarizing this topic". I feel like you don't understand the need they are expressing. But I confirm their doubt, and it's about: where would we know the real level of accuracy of the answers? I have a feeling that you have assumed something and it seems obvious to you, but only to you - no one understands what you understood because you don't clearly share it. In conclusion, no one understands how the mentioned "algorithm [that] would measure all the answers and give their accuracy in %" would work. I think you mean that if there are, for example, 10 answers, you will always give, for example, 55%. If I understood you correctly. But this is just a guess. I am not a fan of such simplifications. It will not work. I also fear that many people do not see ccFound as a place to ask questions as I originally envisioned. Many posts will have a strictly discussion character and such accuracy of answers will not apply here. Simply put, answers are not about gathering knowledge for most people, but rather an exchange of thoughts. In addition, you assume that such a parameter attached to posts will be a competitive advantage. After a few years of creating this platform, I have a hypothesis that for the majority of people it will not bring greater value. And for us, the most important thing should be to bring value to the experts now - to attract them, and to bring their communities here. For me and the whole ccFound team, the most important now is: 1. Launching TGE and further maintaining (within our resources and capabilities) the token price after this event. 2. Developing paid groups: (A) in terms of detailed functions for sales ("details" such as pinning ad system codes, creating own offer templates, upselling and cross-selling, changing the look of the shopping cart), (B) acquiring and onboarding new experts and supporting them to succeed with their paid groups. 3. In a few months, the key will be the ad server system. I know you would like us to have everything and to fulfill every idea proposed, but we do not have unlimited time or budget. We need to focus (like every company) on what is most important. It would help us if when submitting your idea, you tried to think it through thoroughly first, maybe discuss it with your friends, and then describe it very clearly - and also have someone check it (preferably a programmer or someone from the IT industry) if the description is understandable. I don't want to criticize, because I really appreciate the initiative. I just ask for raising the bar and requirements from yourself before we start demanding the realization of our ideas from others. Precise and understandable communication here is a necessity. Otherwise, I spend an hour reading some idea and explaining why we won't take it, when I could have done something productive for the project. In other words, let the ideas submitted be really well thought out.
Thank you for bringing up the topic again, I actually missed your previous post. I read the comments on the previous thread and you respond to many people's doubts with a copy-paste "I aim at giving the accuracy of the answer, which would give the impression of summarizing this topic". I feel like you don't understand the need they are expressing. But I confirm their doubt, and it's about: where would we know the real level of accuracy of the answers? I have a feeling that you have assumed something and it seems obvious to you, but only to you - no one understands what you understood because you don't clearly share it. In conclusion, no one understands how the mentioned "algorithm [that] would measure all the answers and give their accuracy in %" would work. I think you mean that if there are, for example, 10 answers, you will always give, for example, 55%. If I understood you correctly. But this is just a guess. I am not a fan of such simplifications. It will not work. I also fear that many people do not see ccFound as a place to ask questions as I originally envisioned. Many posts will have a strictly discussion character and such accuracy of answers will not apply here. Simply put, answers are not about gathering knowledge for most people, but rather an exchange of thoughts. In addition, you assume that such a parameter attached to posts will be a competitive advantage. After a few years of creating this platform, I have a hypothesis that for the majority of people it will not bring greater value. And for us, the most important thing should be to bring value to the experts now - to attract them, and to bring their communities here. For me and the whole ccFound team, the most important now is: 1. Launching TGE and further maintaining (within our resources and capabilities) the token price after this event. 2. Developing paid groups: (A) in terms of detailed functions for sales ("details" such as pinning ad system codes, creating own offer templates, upselling and cross-selling, changing the look of the shopping cart), (B) acquiring and onboarding new experts and supporting them to succeed with their paid groups. 3. In a few months, the key will be the ad server system. I know you would like us to have everything and to fulfill every idea proposed, but we do not have unlimited time or budget. We need to focus (like every company) on what is most important. It would help us if when submitting your idea, you tried to think it through thoroughly first, maybe discuss it with your friends, and then describe it very clearly - and also have someone check it (preferably a programmer or someone from the IT industry) if the description is understandable. I don't want to criticize, because I really appreciate the initiative. I just ask for raising the bar and requirements from yourself before we start demanding the realization of our ideas from others. Precise and understandable communication here is a necessity. Otherwise, I spend an hour reading some idea and explaining why we won't take it, when I could have done something productive for the project. In other words, let the ideas submitted be really well thought out.

Machine translated