© CCFOUND sp. z o.o. sp.k.

产品带有Zabki标志-真实还是虚假

您好,我有一个问题,因为经常听到不要购买带有齿印标志的产品,据说这些是比尔·盖茨的产品。然而,在互联网上并没有明确的证据表明这些人在Facebook或其他媒体上所说的是真的。我没有找到具体的证明,相反,可以找到一些描述Rainforest Alliance组织标志的文章,要获得这样的标志,需要满足具体的标准。是否有人可以提供关于这些帖子的可靠性的文章或完全反驳它们?提前感谢您提供的任何信息。 附言: 唯一的变化我找到的是确实比尔·盖茨资助了这个组织的5.3百万美元。所以,也许这个怀疑是基于这个基础产生的有关比尔·盖茨的疑虑?
您好,我有一个问题,因为经常听到不要购买带有齿印标志的产品,据说这些是比尔·盖茨的产品。然而,在互联网上并没有明确的证据表明这些人在Facebook或其他媒体上所说的是真的。我没有找到具体的证明,相反,可以找到一些描述Rainforest Alliance组织标志的文章,要获得这样的标志,需要满足具体的标准。是否有人可以提供关于这些帖子的可靠性的文章或完全反驳它们?提前感谢您提供的任何信息。 附言: 唯一的变化我找到的是确实比尔·盖茨资助了这个组织的5.3百万美元。所以,也许这个怀疑是基于这个基础产生的有关比尔·盖茨的疑虑?
Show original content

4 users upvote it!

3 answers


O
According to my knowledge on this matter, there is no credible information suggesting that products with the tooth logo are associated with Bill Gates. The widely accepted fact is that the tooth logo belongs to the Rainforest Alliance organization, which certifies products related to environmental conservation and fair trade. In order to obtain this logo, products must meet specific standards regarding sustainable development and other environmental protection issues. I have not found any articles confirming the credibility of these online entries that suggest the tooth logo is associated with Bill Gates. However, one significant piece of information I found is that Bill Gates has funded the Rainforest Alliance organization with $5.3 million. It is possible that suspicions regarding Bill Gates in relation to the tooth logo have arisen based on this information. However, generally speaking, there is no evidence that products with the tooth logo are fake or associated with Bill Gates. I would recommend checking reliable sources of information and confirming the information before taking it for granted.
According to my knowledge on this matter, there is no credible information suggesting that products with the tooth logo are associated with Bill Gates. The widely accepted fact is that the tooth logo belongs to the Rainforest Alliance organization, which certifies products related to environmental conservation and fair trade. In order to obtain this logo, products must meet specific standards regarding sustainable development and other environmental protection issues. I have not found any articles confirming the credibility of these online entries that suggest the tooth logo is associated with Bill Gates. However, one significant piece of information I found is that Bill Gates has funded the Rainforest Alliance organization with $5.3 million. It is possible that suspicions regarding Bill Gates in relation to the tooth logo have arisen based on this information. However, generally speaking, there is no evidence that products with the tooth logo are fake or associated with Bill Gates. I would recommend checking reliable sources of information and confirming the information before taking it for granted.

Machine translated


1 likes

Anonymous
Follow the money! In the 2022 report, in the Revenue and Support section, it says: 1. Royalty revenue (63%) - US $55,654,335 [Royalty revenue, who pays them so much money as royalties?] 2. Government grants and contracts (23%) - US $20,086,112 [Over 20 billion from the government? Wow] 3. Foundations and corporate grants (8%) - US $7,045,514 [Money from Gates?] 4. Major donors and individuals (4%) - US $3,794,121 [And who is the money from?] 5. Other contract revenue (5%) - US $4,146,336 [Other contracted income, what is it?] 6. Special events - 0% [Why is there zero here? Don't they earn from events?] 7. In-kind contribution (5%) - US $1,505,694 [What is an in-kind contribution?] 8. Other (-5%) - US $4,063,217 [This is a loss and should probably be in expenses.] Do these numbers make sense?
Follow the money! In the 2022 report, in the Revenue and Support section, it says: 1. Royalty revenue (63%) - US $55,654,335 [Royalty revenue, who pays them so much money as royalties?] 2. Government grants and contracts (23%) - US $20,086,112 [Over 20 billion from the government? Wow] 3. Foundations and corporate grants (8%) - US $7,045,514 [Money from Gates?] 4. Major donors and individuals (4%) - US $3,794,121 [And who is the money from?] 5. Other contract revenue (5%) - US $4,146,336 [Other contracted income, what is it?] 6. Special events - 0% [Why is there zero here? Don't they earn from events?] 7. In-kind contribution (5%) - US $1,505,694 [What is an in-kind contribution?] 8. Other (-5%) - US $4,063,217 [This is a loss and should probably be in expenses.] Do these numbers make sense?

Machine translated


1 likes

M
I don't know anything about this topic.
I don't know anything about this topic.

Machine translated