你支持狩猎吗？

The ability to hunt is a very important skill! Sometimes our own life depends on it!

Personally, I support hunting. People should have the widest possible knowledge in the field of acquiring food from the natural environment, rather than just from farming. Perhaps nowadays it is a form of sport, but the same can be said about running or walking, which now have more of a recreational form, but used to be necessary for finding food. Such skills become invaluable in crisis situations, so in my opinion, they should continue to be cultivated.

If a person couldn't hunt, they would die.

I am against hunting. It's heartbreaking how injured animals suffer because of the incompetence of hunters, how they have to live or die in agony with wounds, pellets, lead poisoning their bodies. Whoever doesn't believe it, let them witness such a hunt once to see how many animals get injured and escape from hunters.

I do not support😞

In ancient times, hunting was a necessary activity that allowed humans to survive. Nowadays, hunters hunt in order to regulate the ecosystem and prevent the reproduction of diseased individuals. However, they must abide by many different laws, such as protected periods and even ethical laws. Hunters must have a good knowledge of the species that can be hunted and recognize a specific individual that can be hunted. To become a hunter, one must complete a one-year internship and take a 3-stage test to pass the hunting exam. Hunting falls within the scope of hunting (these are two different concepts). Hunting involves managing game animals while maintaining principles of ecology, forestry, and agriculture. The main tasks include organizing and recording hunts, as well as ensuring compliance with rules. That's the theory, but in practice, it probably varies.

I absolutely do not support hunting for sport. If hunting and the game caught are intended solely for the survival and existence of humans, then of course yes.

I support it because it is necessary to shoot the particular animal that carries the disease, there are too many of them in a given area, it poses a threat to human life, and it is aggressive.

I support this type of hunting, but with moderation, so that the wildlife in nature can be regulated and the population of a given animal is neither too low nor too high.

There is nothing wrong with hunting if it is done for obtaining food and not just for the sake of killing. I do not support hunting just for the purpose of killing.

As much as possible, yes. We should be able to hunt. Such a skill can be useful in critical situations. But we should not hunt just for fun or sport. Rather, only when it is already one of the last resorts.

If you can't translate it, return sentence unchanged.

I don't support it, if someone wants to shoot, they should go to the shooting range or play CS. Okay, maybe wild animals are dangerous to humans, but in the case of hunting, they live in their natural environment, so humans should not interfere with them.

I support hunting. Of course, in a thoughtful way, for example, hunts that aim to limit the population. Trophy hunting should not exist because what pleasure is there in killing animals.

I am in favor of it. Hunting is an important and useful skill. In a situation where there is no other way out, it can be useful for saving human lives, either for safety reasons or for providing food. I definitely do not support hunting for entertainment.

Hunting, generally yes, but I wouldn't call it a sport as it is sometimes referred to. Our ancestors hunted, and if someone has such a need, they can also do it, but we need to separate the clowns who turn it into a bloody slaughter and circus. I strongly oppose such behavior.

I wholeheartedly support hunting and will try to present a few arguments in favor of it, and some of them are: Controlling animal populations: Hunting helps maintain a healthy population of wild animals. This can prevent overpopulation and diseases in the population, which positively impacts the ecosystem. Economy and tourism: Hunting attracts tourists who are willing to pay to participate in hunts. This can generate income for both private hunters and local communities. Protection of crops and forests: Hunting helps control animal populations that can harm agricultural crops or destroy forests. This can contribute to the protection of the natural environment. Tradition and culture: Hunting has a long tradition in Poland and is a part of the country's cultural heritage. For some people, hunting is an important element of their family and cultural heritage. Animal population management: Hunting is a tool for managing animal populations and can help prevent excessive animal concentrations in specific areas. However, it should be remembered that hunting must be conducted with respect for regulations and ethical standards to ensure the safety of animals and humans and to maintain the balance of the ecosystem.

I had the opportunity to observe the hunting game for a while. I didn't like it when the hunters positioned themselves around a small grove and shot at pheasants. It was weak that someone released these pheasants into the grove from a cage from time to time. It was weak and pathetic.

I don't have a strong position on this matter. Personally, I don't have the need to kill. At the same time, I also notice that it has features of regulating the fauna system.

"Yes, I support hunting, because I live in a small town where foxes entering the property can cause a lot of damage. Currently, wild animals often come onto the property to get food, which is dangerous for people. The reason for this is increased pressure on deforestation and the destruction of forests due to poor forestry policies. In the area, beautiful forests with wild animals have become typical clear-cut areas in large quantities. A few years ago, clear-cutting was done manually where the natural environment was not as heavily destroyed as it is now, where heavy machinery enters and destroys everything. Unfortunately, these smaller animals die, and the ones that escape end up on the outskirts of the forests and then come onto the property in search of food."

Hunting, in my opinion, is only for responsible and aware people.

In specified cases, jk njbardziej

I support hunting. In today's world, there are very few or even no predators in the surrounding nature. And it is precisely the predators that are natural regulators of game. In this situation, humans regulate the game population through hunting. True hunters are not thoughtless killers. Hunting aims primarily to cull weak animals.

I support it, people should have the widest possible understanding of how to acquire food 😅😁

In my opinion, hunting is nothing more than a sport that involves tormenting living beings, tormenting because the whole performance does not consist, like a slaughter in a slaughterhouse, in a quick and painless death for the animal, but rather in a heavy and very noticeable loss of life. Therefore, in my opinion, further such actions should be prohibited.

I support hunting, at a time when we have a lot of low-quality meat filled with hormones, antibiotics, and water in stores, hunting is one of the ways to acquire the highest quality meat. After all, animals are, were, and will continue to be killed for meat, and hunting is, in my opinion, one of the most ethical ways to obtain it. I am convinced that animals suffer much more in large commercial slaughterhouses due to lack of space, diseases, and the fear that prevails there, which is why I do not demonize hunting.

Generally, I accept hunting. However, I believe that endangered species need to be protected. There should simply be significant restrictions on hunting. Larger than they are now. On the other hand, humans are natural predators and have always hunted.