•5 年
如果你不能翻译，请保持原句不变。
如果你不能翻译，返回未变的句子。
如果你不能翻译，返回未变的句子。
Show original content
2 users upvote it!
3 answers
Popular
I
Unrestrained reprinting has led to such inflation that people are finding it increasingly difficult to make ends meet. Central banks are trying to curb inflation by raising interest rates, but so far no positive results have been seen, and borrowers are losing their homes and apartments. Plus, higher interest rates are also hurting businesses, and a wave of corporate bankruptcies is the last thing we need right now. It is clear that the governments have no idea how to get out of this swamp into which they have put us. Only one thing is known – there are no easy solutions and always part of society will suffer.
It is known that excess money causes inflation, but in fact we have not been dealing with real printing for a long time, but rather with the digital creation of money. What we call reprinting is actually adding more numbers at the level of central or national banks. As a result, banks can grant low-interest loans to other entities, but I do not mean ordinary people here. In other words, societies do not directly benefit from this money.
For this reason, it is the bankers who are most interested in reprinting as soon as possible. They need fresh cash to continue operating as before, because it will give them something to prove to their shareholders. At the end, they will pay themselves huge bonuses, as was the case in the United States, when billions of dollars were first transferred to rescue failing banks, from which the boards financed, among other things, their bounties.
Elections in the US are coming soon, so we'll see if the same scenario as usual will win, or if someone will come to their senses and decide to take tough measures to save the world from the worst crisis of all time. However, I do not have high hopes that the latter scenario is possible. Popularity polls matter to the authorities, and after their tenure there may even be a deluge.
It is known that excess money causes inflation, but in fact we have not been dealing with real printing for a long time, but rather with the digital creation of money. What we call reprinting is actually adding more numbers at the level of central or national banks. As a result, banks can grant low-interest loans to other entities, but I do not mean ordinary people here. In other words, societies do not directly benefit from this money.
For this reason, it is the bankers who are most interested in reprinting as soon as possible. They need fresh cash to continue operating as before, because it will give them something to prove to their shareholders. At the end, they will pay themselves huge bonuses, as was the case in the United States, when billions of dollars were first transferred to rescue failing banks, from which the boards financed, among other things, their bounties.
Elections in the US are coming soon, so we'll see if the same scenario as usual will win, or if someone will come to their senses and decide to take tough measures to save the world from the worst crisis of all time. However, I do not have high hopes that the latter scenario is possible. Popularity polls matter to the authorities, and after their tenure there may even be a deluge.
Unrestrained reprinting has led to such inflation that people are finding it increasingly difficult to make ends meet. Central banks are trying to curb inflation by raising interest rates, but so far no positive results have been seen, and borrowers are losing their homes and apartments. Plus, higher interest rates are also hurting businesses, and a wave of corporate bankruptcies is the last thing we need right now. It is clear that the governments have no idea how to get out of this swamp into which they have put us. Only one thing is known – there are no easy solutions and always part of society will suffer.
It is known that excess money causes inflation, but in fact we have not been dealing with real printing for a long time, but rather with the digital creation of money. What we call reprinting is actually adding more numbers at the level of central or national banks. As a result, banks can grant low-interest loans to other entities, but I do not mean ordinary people here. In other words, societies do not directly benefit from this money.
For this reason, it is the bankers who are most interested in reprinting as soon as possible. They need fresh cash to continue operating as before, because it will give them something to prove to their shareholders. At the end, they will pay themselves huge bonuses, as was the case in the United States, when billions of dollars were first transferred to rescue failing banks, from which the boards financed, among other things, their bounties.
Elections in the US are coming soon, so we'll see if the same scenario as usual will win, or if someone will come to their senses and decide to take tough measures to save the world from the worst crisis of all time. However, I do not have high hopes that the latter scenario is possible. Popularity polls matter to the authorities, and after their tenure there may even be a deluge.
It is known that excess money causes inflation, but in fact we have not been dealing with real printing for a long time, but rather with the digital creation of money. What we call reprinting is actually adding more numbers at the level of central or national banks. As a result, banks can grant low-interest loans to other entities, but I do not mean ordinary people here. In other words, societies do not directly benefit from this money.
For this reason, it is the bankers who are most interested in reprinting as soon as possible. They need fresh cash to continue operating as before, because it will give them something to prove to their shareholders. At the end, they will pay themselves huge bonuses, as was the case in the United States, when billions of dollars were first transferred to rescue failing banks, from which the boards financed, among other things, their bounties.
Elections in the US are coming soon, so we'll see if the same scenario as usual will win, or if someone will come to their senses and decide to take tough measures to save the world from the worst crisis of all time. However, I do not have high hopes that the latter scenario is possible. Popularity polls matter to the authorities, and after their tenure there may even be a deluge.
Machine translated
1 likes
K
It's possible, they've proven it once. But this time the crisis goes much deeper and wider, and it could have even worse consequences. It is difficult to answer this question unequivocally, because no one has (probably;)) a crystal ball
It's possible, they've proven it once. But this time the crisis goes much deeper and wider, and it could have even worse consequences. It is difficult to answer this question unequivocally, because no one has (probably;)) a crystal ball
Machine translated
O
I am afraid that there is a risk that the current crisis will be crowded out by money, which may lead to similar repercussions as in 2008. It is necessary to carefully monitor the situation and take appropriate action to avoid a repeat of such a disaster.
I am afraid that there is a risk that the current crisis will be crowded out by money, which may lead to similar repercussions as in 2008. It is necessary to carefully monitor the situation and take appropriate action to avoid a repeat of such a disaster.
Machine translated