•1 年
卡罗尔先生，这不是一个调查委员会.....
我理解管理人员的权利。像Szczerba或朱尔斯基主席一样但是你们所有人都有一点，即对民主的尊重。 波兰法院甚至都有理由判决。 CCFOUND法院，例如Karol同事，只是删除帖子。 为什么呢？ 这篇文章里写了什么？ 我不是在说这篇文章的内容，而是在说原则。 创始人说：这个网站是言论自由的，不会进行审核-但实际上不是。 发生了什么？ 真正的问题是否已经解决，不足以没有理由即时删除内容。 我知道这是管理人员的权利-但是……我们应该是平等的。哈哈哈
我理解管理人员的权利。像Szczerba或朱尔斯基主席一样但是你们所有人都有一点，即对民主的尊重。 波兰法院甚至都有理由判决。 CCFOUND法院，例如Karol同事，只是删除帖子。 为什么呢？ 这篇文章里写了什么？ 我不是在说这篇文章的内容，而是在说原则。 创始人说：这个网站是言论自由的，不会进行审核-但实际上不是。 发生了什么？ 真正的问题是否已经解决，不足以没有理由即时删除内容。 我知道这是管理人员的权利-但是……我们应该是平等的。哈哈哈
Show original content
4 users upvote it!
3 answers
Popular
I think he meant criticizing without pointing out a specific problem that could have motivated you to write such an opinion :). I would do the same :)
I think he meant criticizing without pointing out a specific problem that could have motivated you to write such an opinion :). I would do the same :)
Machine translated
1 likes
I have not been involved in legal matters for over a year. I will verify why and who deleted the content and why it is written that I did it. Clearly, I see a system error here.
I have not been involved in legal matters for over a year. I will verify why and who deleted the content and why it is written that I did it. Clearly, I see a system error here.
Machine translated
1 likes
In theory, it passed through the mechanism of a court case. But there, too, it would be necessary to enter a justification.
In theory, it passed through the mechanism of a court case. But there, too, it would be necessary to enter a justification.
Machine translated