关于上市价格的公告
你在嘲笑投资者吗？
尽管你试图通过一个重要的公告来激起兴奋，但你可以看到，对这个项目并没有兴奋。事实上，我认为这个公告实际上宣布了项目的失败。那些能在上市中销售代币的人会将它们卖掉，价格会下跌到0.000000...，然后你会说我们尽力了，代币的价格是市场决定的。我对设定的价格有以下想法：
1) 在成本计算中包括空投是一种技巧。
2) 将价格四舍五入到最后3位数字是一种技巧。因为当你计算它时，成本不是0.008而是0.00847，实际上是0.0085。
3) 你已经锁定了投资者的资金大约3年。在这段时间内，美国的累积通胀率已经达到了25%左右。鉴于单位成本和上市价格，你提议在3年内提供17.7%的溢价。这实际上是超过5%的实际损失。
4) 对不起，但这不公平。某种事物告诉我，作为投资者，我们正在为(5-10)名开发者的薪水提供资金3年。就是这样。结果产生的产品只不过是一个普通的论坛。几乎对于大多数用户来说生成收入的主要渠道，如付费问题，已经被取消，更不用说进步了。
使用DeepL.com翻译（免费版）
你在嘲笑投资者吗？
尽管你试图通过一个重要的公告来激起兴奋，但你可以看到，对这个项目并没有兴奋。事实上，我认为这个公告实际上宣布了项目的失败。那些能在上市中销售代币的人会将它们卖掉，价格会下跌到0.000000...，然后你会说我们尽力了，代币的价格是市场决定的。我对设定的价格有以下想法：
1) 在成本计算中包括空投是一种技巧。
2) 将价格四舍五入到最后3位数字是一种技巧。因为当你计算它时，成本不是0.008而是0.00847，实际上是0.0085。
3) 你已经锁定了投资者的资金大约3年。在这段时间内，美国的累积通胀率已经达到了25%左右。鉴于单位成本和上市价格，你提议在3年内提供17.7%的溢价。这实际上是超过5%的实际损失。
4) 对不起，但这不公平。某种事物告诉我，作为投资者，我们正在为(5-10)名开发者的薪水提供资金3年。就是这样。结果产生的产品只不过是一个普通的论坛。几乎对于大多数用户来说生成收入的主要渠道，如付费问题，已经被取消，更不用说进步了。
使用DeepL.com翻译（免费版）
21 users upvote it!
8 answers
Machine translated
11 likes
Machine translated
8 likes
100 % in agreement. feeling being cheated .
100 % in agreement. feeling being cheated .
Machine translated
2 likes
I think that even if the price were to be 0.05$, very few people would sell their assets at that price. It is impossible not to agree with some of your arguments. However, I think the price of 0.01 could prove to be accurate. Some investors may hold onto their assets because they would consider selling at this price or lower to be unprofitable. Considering the bull market, there is a real chance of the price going up. The street largely buys cheap tokens that enter the market expecting significant profits. It would be good if the project itself attracted potential new investors, not just a cheap token.
I think that even if the price were to be 0.05$, very few people would sell their assets at that price. It is impossible not to agree with some of your arguments. However, I think the price of 0.01 could prove to be accurate. Some investors may hold onto their assets because they would consider selling at this price or lower to be unprofitable. Considering the bull market, there is a real chance of the price going up. The street largely buys cheap tokens that enter the market expecting significant profits. It would be good if the project itself attracted potential new investors, not just a cheap token.
Machine translated
2 likes
Machine translated
2 likes
Are you making fun of investors? Even though you are trying to create excitement as an important announcement, as you can see, there is no excitement about the project. In fact, I think this announcement is legally declaring the failure of the project. Those who can sell the coins in the listing will sell them and the price will drop to 0.000000... and you will say that we tried and the price of the coin was determined in the market. My thoughts on the set price: It's tricky to include airdrops in the cost calculation. Rounding up to the last 3 digits is tricky. Because when you calculate it, the cost is not 0.008 but 0.00847, which is actually 0.0085. You have locked up the investor's money for about 3 years. During this period, the cumulative US inflation rate is already around 25%. Given the unit cost and the listing price, you are proposing a premium of 17.7% for 3 years. That is a loss of over 5% in real terms. I'm sorry, but that's not fair. Something tells me that as investors we are funding a (5-10) developer's salary for 3 years. That's it. And the resulting product is nothing more than an ordinary forum. Almost the only way of generating income for most users like paid questions has been cancelled, let alone progress.
Are you making fun of investors? Even though you are trying to create excitement as an important announcement, as you can see, there is no excitement about the project. In fact, I think this announcement is legally declaring the failure of the project. Those who can sell the coins in the listing will sell them and the price will drop to 0.000000... and you will say that we tried and the price of the coin was determined in the market. My thoughts on the set price: It's tricky to include airdrops in the cost calculation. Rounding up to the last 3 digits is tricky. Because when you calculate it, the cost is not 0.008 but 0.00847, which is actually 0.0085. You have locked up the investor's money for about 3 years. During this period, the cumulative US inflation rate is already around 25%. Given the unit cost and the listing price, you are proposing a premium of 17.7% for 3 years. That is a loss of over 5% in real terms. I'm sorry, but that's not fair. Something tells me that as investors we are funding a (5-10) developer's salary for 3 years. That's it. And the resulting product is nothing more than an ordinary forum. Almost the only way of generating income for most users like paid questions has been cancelled, let alone progress.
Machine translated
3 years ago, I was able to buy 8 - 10 pants from Mavi Jeans with 100 dollars when I participated in Ico, now I am unable to buy 3 pants with this listing price. I hope you understand the seriousness of the situation.
I had hope until I heard the listing price. I hope I'm wrong and ccfound coin will come to a good place but I don't think so.
3 years ago, I was able to buy 8 - 10 pants from Mavi Jeans with 100 dollars when I participated in Ico, now I am unable to buy 3 pants with this listing price. I hope you understand the seriousness of the situation.
I had hope until I heard the listing price. I hope I'm wrong and ccfound coin will come to a good place but I don't think so.
Machine translated
