•2 年
如果你不知道的话，这是一个好消息！
商品货币是一种从其基础商品和供求动态中获得内在价值的货币形式。几个世纪以来，金和银一直被接受为商品货币，这是因为它们的稀缺性和可渴望性。 商品货币有一些固有的限制，比如运输和储存大量货物的挑战。这种物理挑战是它被更灵活的代表性和法定货币所取代的主要原因之一。
商品货币是一种从其基础商品和供求动态中获得内在价值的货币形式。几个世纪以来，金和银一直被接受为商品货币，这是因为它们的稀缺性和可渴望性。 商品货币有一些固有的限制，比如运输和储存大量货物的挑战。这种物理挑战是它被更灵活的代表性和法定货币所取代的主要原因之一。
Show original content
4 users upvote it!
1 answers
Popular
COMMENT ON THE ARTICLE: a. Fiduciary money is not a good, but merely a means of exchange and a unit of account. b. Fiduciary money is not a store of value according to the definition provided in the article: "3. Store of value: Money serves as a store of value, allowing individuals and organizations to save and preserve wealth over time, without losing its value. Current expectations of future supply and demand for assets affect the ability of something to be a good store of value." This is because it is subject to inflation!!! c. Fiduciary money itself does not create a system of control, but is only a useful tool for groups that create oppressive systems (in terms of political systems or criminal cartels). As for BTC: "Bitcoin promises to be another step in the evolution of money. It is based on the same properties that once made gold the de facto monetary medium for centuries, except it has been improved with additional properties such as exceptional portability and divisibility – the same properties that allowed fiduciaries to usurp gold during the last century." BTC has nothing to do with gold because it is neither a commodity nor a physical form that can be transformed into a product perceived as useful by the general population (without specialized knowledge). The current and future price of BTC is based solely on belief (fiduciary character) that it is useful for something (especially that its blockchain is useful), just like traditional money. So far, its advantage over traditional FIAT is its non-inflationary character. However, its biggest drawback is its dependence on electricity both during creation and exchange between market participants. It is worth remembering that in the current world, the energy sector, as a strategic sector, is controlled by the government in most countries. "Bitcoin emerged as an alternative to government restrictions imposed on individuals transferring money and as an alternative to state control over money supply. As long as these premises continue to exist, the demand for bitcoin will continue to grow." What if central banks eventually convert all their current dollars into BTC and as majority owners, they control (restrict) the flow of BTC in the market, and consequently its price and supply for retail holders (citizens)??? This may prove much easier than with ordinary currencies, because BTC will ultimately have a finite number of units. Then, in the next step, they will calmly print more dollars and the magic of bitcoin freedom will easily burst like a soap bubble.
COMMENT ON THE ARTICLE: a. Fiduciary money is not a good, but merely a means of exchange and a unit of account. b. Fiduciary money is not a store of value according to the definition provided in the article: "3. Store of value: Money serves as a store of value, allowing individuals and organizations to save and preserve wealth over time, without losing its value. Current expectations of future supply and demand for assets affect the ability of something to be a good store of value." This is because it is subject to inflation!!! c. Fiduciary money itself does not create a system of control, but is only a useful tool for groups that create oppressive systems (in terms of political systems or criminal cartels). As for BTC: "Bitcoin promises to be another step in the evolution of money. It is based on the same properties that once made gold the de facto monetary medium for centuries, except it has been improved with additional properties such as exceptional portability and divisibility – the same properties that allowed fiduciaries to usurp gold during the last century." BTC has nothing to do with gold because it is neither a commodity nor a physical form that can be transformed into a product perceived as useful by the general population (without specialized knowledge). The current and future price of BTC is based solely on belief (fiduciary character) that it is useful for something (especially that its blockchain is useful), just like traditional money. So far, its advantage over traditional FIAT is its non-inflationary character. However, its biggest drawback is its dependence on electricity both during creation and exchange between market participants. It is worth remembering that in the current world, the energy sector, as a strategic sector, is controlled by the government in most countries. "Bitcoin emerged as an alternative to government restrictions imposed on individuals transferring money and as an alternative to state control over money supply. As long as these premises continue to exist, the demand for bitcoin will continue to grow." What if central banks eventually convert all their current dollars into BTC and as majority owners, they control (restrict) the flow of BTC in the market, and consequently its price and supply for retail holders (citizens)??? This may prove much easier than with ordinary currencies, because BTC will ultimately have a finite number of units. Then, in the next step, they will calmly print more dollars and the magic of bitcoin freedom will easily burst like a soap bubble.
Machine translated
1 likes