The translation of the text into Vietnamese while keeping the text formatting and newlines is as follows: The text in Vietnamese: Ai theo các bạn là thủ tướng xuất sắc nhất của Ba Lan?

To be honest, I do not know all the Prime Ministers of the Third Polish Republic, many of them served before my conscious life when I was a child. I definitely do not rejoice in Tusk, just as I would not rejoice in Morawiecki. I still stand by my opinion that regardless of who becomes the Prime Minister, Poland's interests will be neglected by him and there will be a plethora of harmful laws and reforms. I believe that current politics worldwide creates an illusion of choice, when in reality, there are only a handful of independent individuals willing to change anything for the better, and they are silenced. We will have a laugh at Hołownia's jokes, Braun's pranks, and that guy from PiS who invades another politician's personal space, making a circus in the parliamentary chamber. Later, we will return to the gray reality of imposing new taxes and oppressing the Polish people.

Important is that PiS managed to be taken away from power. I don't rejoice in Tusk. In my opinion, Jerzy Buzek's government carried out the biggest reforms, including public finances, pensions, and healthcare - the effects of which are another matter since subsequent rulers had an influence on them. It was the most substantive and diplomatic, lasting until the end of the term. Of course, there are many accusations that can be made against him, but I suppose that applies to everyone. However, that was a relatively stable time, despite so many reforms, and it was evident that there was some vision and its implementation. However, no government since joining the EU took care not to incur debt for the country. Unfortunately, in order to "benefit" from the EU, we were forced to feed various financial institutions with public funds. Instead of reducing and limiting consumption, the emphasis was placed on rapid development rather than stability, destroying Polish agriculture - which should be a priority because we have the conditions for it - instead of allocating land of class I to III for wind turbines. I particularly didn't like the left turn and lack of reaction to what was happening in the healthcare system, etc.

Jan Olszewski - could have been the best Prime Minister but... it threatened the interests of those who pull the strings from behind the scenes. He became the "shortest" Prime Minister - under pressure from "Bolek" he had to give way to the "first firefighter of Poland" - the one who began his term by buying a set of suits with our money. "Such is our political climate".

Definitely not Morawiecki!

The important thing is the economy generating income for Poland. Which of them has done the most good in this matter?

Heavy question, first you would need to know all the prime ministers, then analyze what actions they took and what the effects were. Without that, we can only choose who is most memorable to us, and that often comes from emotions associated with a particular person, rather than what they actually did. Donald Tusk is rather associated with stagnation and managing to maintain the current state (the famous hot water in the tap) rather than striving for further development. This has its pros and cons, but Poland requires rather proactive politics, planning, solving existing problems, and intelligent development rather than resting on its laurels.

In my opinion, Jan Olszewski, but he didn't have much time to do anything because he was a threat to the system. And more recently, Beata Szydło, although she was prematurely replaced by a Liar.

Determining who would be better is completely pointless because it is not the Prime Minister who makes decisions on their own as they would simply not be able to handle everything. Tusk is bad in a way because he has already been in power and has shown how he can govern and sell off the country's assets. The first example that comes to mind is LOT, during his time it was supposed to be sold because it was not profitable and now it's in a great place worldwide. So what is there to discuss? CPK is the future of the country and Trzaskowski says "megalomania" - PO=EVIL. Typical waste of money.

The most sovereign Prime Minister of the Third Polish Republic, in my opinion, was Jan Olszewski. Unfortunately, his government was prevented from implementing beneficial reforms for Poland.

The best prime minister was Jan Olszewski. As for Tusk, people have quickly forgotten how hopeless his rule was and some are happy about it. Of course, Morawiecki's rule was not better at all, which is why I really like the attitude of the Confederation, because they see what was happening and are not afraid to talk about it. As we can see, things are not so bad in Poland yet, since people are satisfied with such reshuffles, but it doesn't change the fact that for the past 30 years we have been going downhill on a slippery slope, only the "leaders" change, but the direction remains the same.

For me, Murawiecki is better.

Welcome. It depends on one hand it's good because something may change for the better, but on the other hand it depends if it doesn't change the faction and won't play against change.

According to me, it doesn't matter... and let's not fool ourselves, the promises of Polish prime ministers are one big hypocrisy.... But in my opinion, our former prime minister Morawiecki is a badass... 😎🤣

"Of course, we have divided opinions about the choice of Donald Tusk as the prime minister. Since he has already held this position in the past, some people are afraid that the situation will repeat itself as it did eight years ago. However, there is also a large group of people who are happy with this decision. On the internet, you can find many videos showing joy and satisfaction with the dismissal of the Morawiecki government and the removal of PiS from power. But what is your opinion? Are you happy with the choice of Donald Tusk as the new prime minister? And in your opinion, which prime minister has performed the best in this position since 1989?"

Morawiecki

Donald Tusk

Marek Belka And without comment.

In my opinion, it is not a matter of joy or lack of it from the choice of a person for a position, but a matter of actions that will be taken and implemented: that should be the only subject of judgment. I will refrain from expressing an opinion about the current Prime Minister's performance due to not having current data, and I will not refer to the past activities of D. Tusk. I am currently in an observer position.

Each of us has a different opinion on the choice of Donald Tusk as prime minister. A lot of people, mainly older individuals, are concerned because he previously held this position and they fear that the same situations may repeat themselves from a few years ago. But there is also a group of people who are happy about the dismissal of Mateusz Morawiecki and PiS from power and express their joy and satisfaction on the Internet. In my opinion, Mateusz Morawiecki and PiS should continue to hold power because the majority of our country voted for them, but apparently the society living in our country has nothing to say about it. What is your opinion on this matter? Do you think our government made the right decision by choosing Donald Tusk as prime minister? Who, in your opinion, has served their role the best and was the best prime minister since 1989?

rather, I don't think so yet.