© CCFOUND sp. z o.o. sp.k.

Атомні електростанції метою.

Росія, як показує історія, є країною, яка розуміє виключно “мову” сили військової. 

Україна отримала незалежність у 1990 році. На підставі міжнародного Будапештського договору 1994 року, отримавши “гарантії безпеки” від США, Великої Британії та Росії, передала всю свою, отриману після розпаду Радянського Союзу, ядерну зброю (тоді третій найбільший арсенал ядерної зброї у світі) Росії. У лютому 2022 року Росія напала на Україну, війна триває до сьогодні.

Чи повинні США передати Україні звичайну зброю, що дозволяє удар у відповідь по атомним електростанціям, що знаходяться на території Росії?

Росія, як показує історія, є країною, яка розуміє виключно “мову” сили військової. 

Україна отримала незалежність у 1990 році. На підставі міжнародного Будапештського договору 1994 року, отримавши “гарантії безпеки” від США, Великої Британії та Росії, передала всю свою, отриману після розпаду Радянського Союзу, ядерну зброю (тоді третій найбільший арсенал ядерної зброї у світі) Росії. У лютому 2022 року Росія напала на Україну, війна триває до сьогодні.

Чи повинні США передати Україні звичайну зброю, що дозволяє удар у відповідь по атомним електростанціям, що знаходяться на території Росії?

Show original content

63%

(5 votes)

25%

(2 votes)

13%

(1 vote)

1 user upvote it!

2 answers


michal51525

They should be armed because we cannot allow Russia to win. However, I would not allow them to attack nuclear power plants. This will not lead to anything good. NATO and the UN should act more decisively regarding Russia, which is clearly doing whatever it wants and violating all international standards.

They should be armed because we cannot allow Russia to win. However, I would not allow them to attack nuclear power plants. This will not lead to anything good. NATO and the UN should act more decisively regarding Russia, which is clearly doing whatever it wants and violating all international standards.

Machine translated


1 like

chomikgrizzly

No, because the so-called Ukraine does not exist. Who is in charge there? Well, it's already an openly murderous mafia that has outlawed the opposition and imprisoned those who disagreed with it. Zelensky, elected on the promises of bringing peace with Russia and prosperity, is doing the complete opposite of what he promised. And you would want to give this mafia nuclear weapons? It was Zelensky who made the decision for the first attacks, not Russia, as can be seen from recordings that have been circulating on the internet since around 2014, about the missile attacks on the cities of 'separatists' in Donbas or whatever it's called. 'Servant of the Nation', right? There are also recordings from his campaign where he swears that we must live peacefully with Russia, and on the basis of that, he was elected, and he betrayed his people, and there are already probably a million people buried in the ground. Truly a wonderful Ukraine and its independence, of course, give them nuclear weapons. Good night.

No, because the so-called Ukraine does not exist. Who is in charge there? Well, it's already an openly murderous mafia that has outlawed the opposition and imprisoned those who disagreed with it. Zelensky, elected on the promises of bringing peace with Russia and prosperity, is doing the complete opposite of what he promised. And you would want to give this mafia nuclear weapons? It was Zelensky who made the decision for the first attacks, not Russia, as can be seen from recordings that have been circulating on the internet since around 2014, about the missile attacks on the cities of 'separatists' in Donbas or whatever it's called. 'Servant of the Nation', right? There are also recordings from his campaign where he swears that we must live peacefully with Russia, and on the basis of that, he was elected, and he betrayed his people, and there are already probably a million people buried in the ground. Truly a wonderful Ukraine and its independence, of course, give them nuclear weapons. Good night.

Machine translated