If you can't translate it or language is incorrect, return source text only.

I think that religion should not be a mandatory subject. Let the child be present in these classes and decide for themselves whether they want to participate in these classes or not, and whether the content being conveyed in this lesson is appropriate.
As for ethics, I am not really convinced about it.

I exactly agree that ethics lessons be mandatory, and religious lessons be optional.

Religion and ethics should be a choice so that young people can decide for themselves what is best for them, rather than imposing on them what they should learn. It is difficult to determine unequivocally what is better in imposing this on young people.

This is a matter that sparks many discussions and different opinions in different countries and communities. The choice between religious classes and ethics in schools depends on many factors, including cultural, social, and legal factors. Here are a few arguments both for and against whether religious classes in schools should be replaced by ethics:

Arguments for replacing religious classes with ethics:
1. Worldview neutrality: Education in ethics is more worldview neutral, which means it does not promote a specific religion or belief system. This can be fairer and more balanced in societies with diverse religious beliefs.

2. Accessibility for all: Ethics classes are more accessible and acceptable for students with different religious affiliations or no affiliation. All students can participate regardless of their religious beliefs.

3. Covers a wider range of topics: Ethics classes often cover diverse topics such as morality, social responsibility, human rights, social justice, and many others, which can be more interdisciplinary and relevant.

4. Develops critical thinking: Ethics classes often focus on developing critical thinking, analyzing moral dilemmas, and discussing different perspectives, which is important for the development of students.

Arguments against replacing religious classes with ethics:
1. Freedom of religion: In some countries, religious classes in schools are an integral part of freedom of religion. Replacing them with ethics may be seen as a violation of this freedom.

2. Family values: For some families, religious classes are important due to their traditions and values. Replacing them with ethics may be seen as a violation of those values.

3. Knowledge of culture and history: Religious classes often include knowledge about the history and culture of different religions, which is important for understanding cultural diversity.

4. Choice: For some students and parents, it is important to have a choice between attending religious classes or ethics.

The final decision on this matter depends on local regulations, social norms, and the preferences of parents and students. In some places, there may be a choice between religious classes and ethics, while in other educational systems, there may be a specific policy regarding what is taught in schools. It is important to continue the dialogue and open discussion on this topic to find the best solution for a given society.

Religion is very personal. Every household has different beliefs and every individual should be taught anything about religion outside of school to avoid clashes with friends. Religion should be taught at religious institutes such as Church or Mosque or the Hindu temples etc. 

However, ethics should be made mandatory because all students should be taught the basic rights and wrongs of the society we live in. It is crucial that along with subject knowledge, students leave school with an understanding of respect, right and wrong, moral decisions and how to think critically in a particular situation. Ethics is also a crucial aspect of many other subjects taught at school and can tie in nicely such as science and computing.

And do you think that religious lessons should be replaced with ethics lessons?
- no

Are there choices between religion and ethics in your children's schools?
- I don't know

Should ethics lessons be mandatory and religion lessons for those who are interested?
- yes

What is your opinion on this matter?
- ethics as "the set of principles and norms of conduct adopted in a given era and environment" can have many concepts depending on the chosen religion or accepted form of atheism.
Ethics is inherent in "religion."

What kind of ethics should be taught in schools to avoid hurting society's feelings?
- Probably based on classical philosophy. However, it has been rejected for many years - excluded as resistant to ideologization (see United States, post-communist countries, EU, among others). It is consistent with the teachings of the Church - and here lies the problem, tension arises, as how to separate something from the state that is part of objective logic (Greek philosophy seeking meaning and understanding).

Adherents of various faiths, it is an individual matter for everyone, and when it comes to teaching in school, in my opinion, there should be a choice of which class to attend, whether it be religion or ethics. It's good that there is still no Muslim or Orthodox faith 😁

Whether religious classes in schools should be replaced with ethics classes is a matter of ongoing debate and depends on various factors, including cultural, legal, and educational contexts. Here are some points to consider:

1. Secularism: Many countries promote secularism and maintain a clear separation of church and state. In such contexts, public schools typically do not endorse or promote any particular religion. Instead, they may offer ethics or moral education courses that are intended to be neutral and inclusive of diverse beliefs.

2. Pluralism: In culturally diverse societies, there is a wide range of religious beliefs and worldviews. Teaching a particular religion in public schools might exclude or alienate students who do not adhere to that religion. Ethics classes, which focus on universal values and principles, can be more inclusive and respectful of different belief systems.

3. Freedom of Religion: Public education should respect the freedom of religion and the right of individuals to practice their faith. In many countries, religious classes are offered as elective courses or extracurricular activities, allowing students to choose whether they want to participate.

4. Teaching Ethics: Ethics classes can provide a foundation for teaching values, morals, and critical thinking skills without promoting a specific religious doctrine. They can cover topics like empathy, respect, responsibility, and ethical decision-making, which are applicable to various belief systems and can help students develop strong moral character.

5. Comparative Religion: Some argue that comparative religion classes, which explore the beliefs and practices of various world religions without promoting any one faith, can be a valuable addition to the curriculum. This can help students understand different cultures and beliefs, fostering tolerance and religious literacy.

6. Community Preferences: The role of religion in schools can also depend on the preferences of the local community. In some places, there may be strong support for religious education, while in others, there may be a desire for secular and inclusive ethics classes.

Ultimately, the decision to replace religious classes with ethics classes or to find a balance between the two should be made taking into account the specific context, legal frameworks, and the values and preferences of the community. It's important for educational systems to be respectful of diverse beliefs while also promoting values that contribute to the development of responsible and ethical citizens.

Yes, religious classes in school should be replaced with ethics. While religious teachings can offer valuable guidance and spiritual teachings, they can also perpetuate narrow-mindedness and divisiveness in our increasingly diverse society. Ethics, on the other hand, provides a broader perspective on how to treat others and how to live a fulfilling life regardless of religious beliefs.

In a world where religious tensions and conflicts continue to exist, the integration of ethics into school curriculum can provide a common ground for students from different faiths and backgrounds to learn and appreciate each other's perspectives. By focusing on ethical principles such as honesty, respect, and compassion, students can learn to navigate real-world situations that require moral decision-making skills without resorting to judgment or dogmatic teachings.

Furthermore, while religious teachings may only apply to students who subscribe to a particular faith, ethics are relevant to everyone. The emphasis on ethics in schools would promote empathy, social awareness, and responsible citizenship among all students regardless of religious affiliation.

Therefore, it's high time that we reconsider our current school curriculum and explore ways to incorporate ethics education in lieu of religious classes. This shift will not only better equip our future generations with the essential skills to navigate moral complexities but also promote mutual respect and understanding in our increasingly pluralistic society.

Religion is a matter of individual choice, it is directed towards a limited group of recipients, in my opinion it should be conducted as an additional subject because it is not intended for every person. Ethics, on the other hand, is not focused on one group of recipients, which would result in more people benefiting from this knowledge and it would be useful in life regardless of one's beliefs and so on.

I would like to add that religion is not religious studies and focuses only on the dominant religion in a given country.

I think it could be blended with other classes instead.

I believe that there should be a choice between religion/ethics. Everyone would choose what they want to attend, and such classes would be mandatory. The current state is not the worst either, but currently, students who do not attend religion have breaks or go to the library, which is not a good solution.