TOKENA AIRDROP $FOUND dari ccFOUND
🪂 Jika Anda tertarik dengan token gratis tambahan $FOUND, saya ingin mengingatkan tentang airdrop dari #ccFOUND.
- Ada 200.000 $FOUND senilai $10.000 yang akan dibagikan (berdasarkan harga listing).
- Untuk berpartisipasi dalam airdrop, Anda harus menyelesaikan tugas-tugas yang disiapkan oleh tim melalui platform #Zealy.
- Airdrop berlangsung selama 3 minggu. Dimulai pada 22 Maret (Jumat) jam 14:00.
- Setiap minggu akan ada tugas baru yang ditambahkan.
Informasi lebih lanjut, seperti biasa, bisa ditemukan di sumbernya.
*Jika Anda menggunakan browser Brave dan tidak ada yang ditampilkan, silakan nonaktifkan proteksi untuk situs ini.
- Link tugas di Zealy: https://zealy.io/cw/ccfound/invite/g5PstnxF5r5ltjTwNUwOS
🪂 Jika Anda tertarik dengan token gratis tambahan $FOUND, saya ingin mengingatkan tentang airdrop dari #ccFOUND.
- Ada 200.000 $FOUND senilai $10.000 yang akan dibagikan (berdasarkan harga listing).
- Untuk berpartisipasi dalam airdrop, Anda harus menyelesaikan tugas-tugas yang disiapkan oleh tim melalui platform #Zealy.
- Airdrop berlangsung selama 3 minggu. Dimulai pada 22 Maret (Jumat) jam 14:00.
- Setiap minggu akan ada tugas baru yang ditambahkan.
Informasi lebih lanjut, seperti biasa, bisa ditemukan di sumbernya.
*Jika Anda menggunakan browser Brave dan tidak ada yang ditampilkan, silakan nonaktifkan proteksi untuk situs ini.
- Link tugas di Zealy: https://zealy.io/cw/ccfound/invite/g5PstnxF5r5ltjTwNUwOS
https://twitter.com/search?q...
Show original content
5 users upvote it!
1 answers
Popular
It would be cool if it stayed permanently. Like, for example, so that someone, for example: "Me" could add their task to be accepted, of course I would have to pay CCFound for advertising by buying tokens (in this case I could pay in Fiat or USDT, immediately converted into tokens), which would be a good lever to drive demand for tokens, pushing their price up over time. It would be good if these tokens went into some form of custody (piggy bank), with conditions that they cannot be broken until the community finds a profitable use for them to multiply them in some way, for example by introducing a new value-added feature. The goal is for the market to see that the number of tokens is decreasing and they cannot be easily unlocked, and if so, only to further increase the value of the tokens by issuing them for some kind of work (effort). Why like this? Because I have long thought about what the problem with fundraising is, so when Creators receive money upfront as with ICOs, the motivation to fulfill promises decreases like a politician's after winning elections. Plenty of examples. I heard what happened with Polish Lisk. And EOS did not impress me at all despite raising four thousand MILLION, so 4000 million dollars, and then what, have you heard about them since then doing any kind of revolution? I haven't. So, if funds were released for specific fees associated with achieving goals, and openly, the team must prove it, or the money will be stuck in the so-called "escrow". This is the only fair contract between investors and executors. Instead of transferring everything to the executor's account after a successful fundraiser. Suspend the funds, and expenses must also be authorized by everyone involved in some kind of DAO management system (like in the Holacracy system, where if someone has a legitimate objection, there is a "dispute" and mediations until doubts about the execution of the action are resolved. Contrary to appearances, it is not obstructionist, a legitimate dispute is something that someone from the investors or employees really has to stand in the way and show arguments, "but instead of this, you can do it like this, this, and this", it is similar to a marital oath "if anyone is opposed, let them speak now, or forever hold their peace", so minor costs do not have to get bogged down in disputes, there is also a book about it "Reinventing Organizations" by Frederic Laloux, I highly recommend it). Then the executor must constantly justify (declare) before each sum is spent, for what, why, and whether it can be done cheaper, and why it needs to be done, and the investor can actively participate and have control to ensure that the team does not withdraw funds for nonsense, so they cannot have any complaints later if the project fails! So win-win! Just a note to take, since CCfound is supposed to be a DAO in the future, @Support_ccFOUND.
It would be cool if it stayed permanently. Like, for example, so that someone, for example: "Me" could add their task to be accepted, of course I would have to pay CCFound for advertising by buying tokens (in this case I could pay in Fiat or USDT, immediately converted into tokens), which would be a good lever to drive demand for tokens, pushing their price up over time. It would be good if these tokens went into some form of custody (piggy bank), with conditions that they cannot be broken until the community finds a profitable use for them to multiply them in some way, for example by introducing a new value-added feature. The goal is for the market to see that the number of tokens is decreasing and they cannot be easily unlocked, and if so, only to further increase the value of the tokens by issuing them for some kind of work (effort). Why like this? Because I have long thought about what the problem with fundraising is, so when Creators receive money upfront as with ICOs, the motivation to fulfill promises decreases like a politician's after winning elections. Plenty of examples. I heard what happened with Polish Lisk. And EOS did not impress me at all despite raising four thousand MILLION, so 4000 million dollars, and then what, have you heard about them since then doing any kind of revolution? I haven't. So, if funds were released for specific fees associated with achieving goals, and openly, the team must prove it, or the money will be stuck in the so-called "escrow". This is the only fair contract between investors and executors. Instead of transferring everything to the executor's account after a successful fundraiser. Suspend the funds, and expenses must also be authorized by everyone involved in some kind of DAO management system (like in the Holacracy system, where if someone has a legitimate objection, there is a "dispute" and mediations until doubts about the execution of the action are resolved. Contrary to appearances, it is not obstructionist, a legitimate dispute is something that someone from the investors or employees really has to stand in the way and show arguments, "but instead of this, you can do it like this, this, and this", it is similar to a marital oath "if anyone is opposed, let them speak now, or forever hold their peace", so minor costs do not have to get bogged down in disputes, there is also a book about it "Reinventing Organizations" by Frederic Laloux, I highly recommend it). Then the executor must constantly justify (declare) before each sum is spent, for what, why, and whether it can be done cheaper, and why it needs to be done, and the investor can actively participate and have control to ensure that the team does not withdraw funds for nonsense, so they cannot have any complaints later if the project fails! So win-win! Just a note to take, since CCfound is supposed to be a DAO in the future, @Support_ccFOUND.
Machine translated