¿Con qué se puede comparar el ritmo de desarrollo del portal CCFOUND?

125 USUARIOS al mes 30 PRODUCTOS al mesMiro como siempre por el valor educativo del desarrollo. Eso nos da 1 producto y 4 usuarios al día. A este ritmo, temo que no alcancemos a Google.He oído en entrevistas que estamos construyendo un contrapeso para Google. Y no me digas que la culpa es de los usuarios. Con ese presupuesto, esperaba un impacto mejor.Pregunta directa, aunque supongo que ya no hay propietarios valientes de esta criatura: ¿PLANES? PUBLICIDAD? ¿Me responderás, Piotr - Paweł, no te vuelvas loco, es tu responsabilidad no la mía - yo te di la caña y tú pescas. Pero esa caña es un poco prehistórica y no me proporcionaste cebo;)
125 USUARIOS al mes 30 PRODUCTOS al mesMiro como siempre por el valor educativo del desarrollo. Eso nos da 1 producto y 4 usuarios al día. A este ritmo, temo que no alcancemos a Google.He oído en entrevistas que estamos construyendo un contrapeso para Google. Y no me digas que la culpa es de los usuarios. Con ese presupuesto, esperaba un impacto mejor.Pregunta directa, aunque supongo que ya no hay propietarios valientes de esta criatura: ¿PLANES? PUBLICIDAD? ¿Me responderás, Piotr - Paweł, no te vuelvas loco, es tu responsabilidad no la mía - yo te di la caña y tú pescas. Pero esa caña es un poco prehistórica y no me proporcionaste cebo;)
Show original content

10 users upvote it!

10 answers


gbksiazczak
I wouldn't expect too much of plans (because there are many of them here, on every quarterly occasion) but rather visible results of implementing these plans. The first quarter of the 21st century is ending and we still have a shabby graphic design, poor functionality, and plenty of errors/flaws. In my opinion, these are poorly invested money and negligence of tfurcuf (don't be fooled by PM's pathetic texts from time to time).
I wouldn't expect too much of plans (because there are many of them here, on every quarterly occasion) but rather visible results of implementing these plans. The first quarter of the 21st century is ending and we still have a shabby graphic design, poor functionality, and plenty of errors/flaws. In my opinion, these are poorly invested money and negligence of tfurcuf (don't be fooled by PM's pathetic texts from time to time).

Machine translated


2 likes

gbksiazczak
Snail attack on the "temporary" 1900 tower in Paris.
Snail attack on the "temporary" 1900 tower in Paris.

Machine translated


2 likes

KJ1
I agree - badly invested money, if there was a possibility I would withdraw (what I put in). I will add - Support is also a bit weak (maybe just in relation to me). Best regards
I agree - badly invested money, if there was a possibility I would withdraw (what I put in). I will add - Support is also a bit weak (maybe just in relation to me). Best regards

Machine translated


2 likes

b00kie
Good question
Good question

Machine translated


1 like

supportccfound
In this article, Piotr addresses our current plans and struggles: https://ccfound.com/pl/articles/12579/co-teraz-robimy-ccfound-szybka-aktualizacja-27-05-2024 We are constantly working on acquiring users :).
In this article, Piotr addresses our current plans and struggles: https://ccfound.com/pl/articles/12579/co-teraz-robimy-ccfound-szybka-aktualizacja-27-05-2024 We are constantly working on acquiring users :).

Machine translated

https://ccfound.com/pl/artic...

1 like

Anónimo
Is Octavius a turtle?
Is Octavius a turtle?

Machine translated


Witu
Again, no response, no real marketing, almost nothing is happening on X, as if it was supposed to work on its own
Again, no response, no real marketing, almost nothing is happening on X, as if it was supposed to work on its own

Machine translated


utkudeniz

I think this startup has failed and the team has accepted that. It was already clear from the development of the portal that this was going to happen. In the first listing, a lucky few investors were able to get their money back. They are still stalling with staking. The token price dropped to $0.0025. Trading volume is almost zero. There is no new cex listing. With staking, they lock tokens for 6 months or even 1 year. The revenue generated is a funny value with this performance of $found. I think the only thing left now is to declare the project bankrupt. Extra time in the match

I think this startup has failed and the team has accepted that. It was already clear from the development of the portal that this was going to happen. In the first listing, a lucky few investors were able to get their money back. They are still stalling with staking. The token price dropped to $0.0025. Trading volume is almost zero. There is no new cex listing. With staking, they lock tokens for 6 months or even 1 year. The revenue generated is a funny value with this performance of $found. I think the only thing left now is to declare the project bankrupt. Extra time in the match

Machine translated


Lizard
We were not able to attract an investor for the development of the portal, so the creators are struggling. Normally, this type of portals require millions for advertising and development. I have the impression that the choice of a new technology related to crypto does not help in rapid development either. The new technology involves a small number of people who are familiar with it, which results in higher salaries for employees and higher costs of implementing changes on the portal. And now we are somewhat caught in a vicious circle - there is no money to hire more programmers, so the portal's improvement is slow, the portal does not meet requirements so it doesn't make sense to advertise it, there is no advertising so there are few users, a small number of users do not encourage use. I hope that the creators will be able to break this vicious circle and the portal will grow. It is known that beginnings are the most difficult.
We were not able to attract an investor for the development of the portal, so the creators are struggling. Normally, this type of portals require millions for advertising and development. I have the impression that the choice of a new technology related to crypto does not help in rapid development either. The new technology involves a small number of people who are familiar with it, which results in higher salaries for employees and higher costs of implementing changes on the portal. And now we are somewhat caught in a vicious circle - there is no money to hire more programmers, so the portal's improvement is slow, the portal does not meet requirements so it doesn't make sense to advertise it, there is no advertising so there are few users, a small number of users do not encourage use. I hope that the creators will be able to break this vicious circle and the portal will grow. It is known that beginnings are the most difficult.

Machine translated


MattPotgieter

Totally agree. I had such big hopes for this project as my profession is Educational technology. Had huge potnetial but worry that focus is not being placed on the actuall things that could change the paltforms current trajectory.

Totally agree. I had such big hopes for this project as my profession is Educational technology. Had huge potnetial but worry that focus is not being placed on the actuall things that could change the paltforms current trajectory.

Machine translated